Detecting Perceived Appropriateness of a Robot's Social Positioning Behavior from Non-Verbal Cues

J. Vroon, G. Englebienne, V. Evers
{"title":"Detecting Perceived Appropriateness of a Robot's Social Positioning Behavior from Non-Verbal Cues","authors":"J. Vroon, G. Englebienne, V. Evers","doi":"10.1109/CogMI48466.2019.00039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What if a robot could detect when you think it got too close to you during its approach? This would allow it to correct or compensate for its social 'mistake'. It would also allow for a responsive approach, where that robot would reactively find suitable approach behavior through and during the interaction. We investigated if it is possible to automatically detect such social feedback cues in the context of a robot approaching a person. We collected a dataset in which our robot would repeatedly approach people (n=30) to verbally deliver a message. Approach distance and environmental noise were manipulated, and our participants were tracked (position and orientation of upper body and head). We evaluated their perception of the robot's behavior through questionnaires and found no single or joint effects of the manipulations. This showed that, in this case, personal differences are more important than contextual cues – thus highlighting the importance of responding to behavioral feedback. This dataset is being made publicly available as part of this publication † . On this dataset, we then trained a random forest classifier to infer people's perception of the robot's approach behavior from features generated from the response behaviors. This resulted in a set of relevant features that perform significantly better than chance for a participant-dependent classifier; which implies that the behaviors of our participants, even with our relatively limited tracking, contain interpretable information about their perception of the robot's behavior. Our findings demonstrate, for this specific context, that the observable behavior of people does indeed contain usable information about their subjective perception of a robot's behavior. As such they, together with the dataset, provide a stepping stone for future research into the automatic detection of such social feedback cues, e.g. with other or more fine-grained observations of people's behavior (such as facial expressions), with more sophisticated machine learning techniques, and/or in different contexts.","PeriodicalId":116160,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE First International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE First International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CogMI48466.2019.00039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

What if a robot could detect when you think it got too close to you during its approach? This would allow it to correct or compensate for its social 'mistake'. It would also allow for a responsive approach, where that robot would reactively find suitable approach behavior through and during the interaction. We investigated if it is possible to automatically detect such social feedback cues in the context of a robot approaching a person. We collected a dataset in which our robot would repeatedly approach people (n=30) to verbally deliver a message. Approach distance and environmental noise were manipulated, and our participants were tracked (position and orientation of upper body and head). We evaluated their perception of the robot's behavior through questionnaires and found no single or joint effects of the manipulations. This showed that, in this case, personal differences are more important than contextual cues – thus highlighting the importance of responding to behavioral feedback. This dataset is being made publicly available as part of this publication † . On this dataset, we then trained a random forest classifier to infer people's perception of the robot's approach behavior from features generated from the response behaviors. This resulted in a set of relevant features that perform significantly better than chance for a participant-dependent classifier; which implies that the behaviors of our participants, even with our relatively limited tracking, contain interpretable information about their perception of the robot's behavior. Our findings demonstrate, for this specific context, that the observable behavior of people does indeed contain usable information about their subjective perception of a robot's behavior. As such they, together with the dataset, provide a stepping stone for future research into the automatic detection of such social feedback cues, e.g. with other or more fine-grained observations of people's behavior (such as facial expressions), with more sophisticated machine learning techniques, and/or in different contexts.
从非语言线索检测机器人社会定位行为的感知适当性
如果机器人在接近你的过程中,你认为它离你太近了,它能察觉出来吗?这将允许它纠正或补偿它的社会“错误”。这也将允许一个响应的方法,其中机器人将反应性地找到合适的接近行为通过和在交互过程中。我们研究了在机器人接近人类的情况下,是否有可能自动检测到这种社会反馈线索。我们收集了一个数据集,其中我们的机器人会反复接近人类(n=30),口头传递信息。我们控制了接近距离和环境噪声,并跟踪了我们的参与者(上半身和头部的位置和方向)。我们通过问卷调查评估了他们对机器人行为的感知,并没有发现操纵的单一或联合影响。这表明,在这种情况下,个人差异比上下文线索更重要,因此强调了对行为反馈做出反应的重要性。该数据集作为本出版物的一部分公开提供†。在这个数据集上,我们训练了一个随机森林分类器,从响应行为产生的特征中推断人们对机器人接近行为的感知。这导致了一组相关特征的表现明显优于参与者依赖分类器的机会;这意味着我们的参与者的行为,即使我们的跟踪相对有限,也包含了他们对机器人行为的感知的可解释信息。我们的研究结果表明,在这种特定的情况下,人们的可观察行为确实包含了他们对机器人行为的主观感知的可用信息。因此,它们与数据集一起,为未来自动检测此类社会反馈线索的研究提供了踏脚石,例如,使用其他或更细粒度的人们行为观察(如面部表情),使用更复杂的机器学习技术,和/或在不同的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信