Social rights as fundamental rights and the judicialization of policies: some considerations

R. Schwarz
{"title":"Social rights as fundamental rights and the judicialization of policies: some considerations","authors":"R. Schwarz","doi":"10.14295/juris.v28i2.8470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effective constitutional recognition of social rights, by itself, establishes—in any circumstance, even in times of economic crisis—a “hard” nucleus, unavailable to the various public and/or political agents and authorities (including the courts) in terms of meeting social demands, in a manner that this minimum will constitute, in the action of these various agents and authorities, including in the scope of the Public Administration’s actions, an insurmountable barrier that requires permanent boundaries and a certain integration between justice and politics, among judges, legislators and administrators. The judiciary, however, must guide its action by the search for possible mediation between guaranteeing the rights of all, the principle of separation of powers and balancing the budget.","PeriodicalId":218104,"journal":{"name":"JURIS - Revista da Faculdade de Direito","volume":"2016 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURIS - Revista da Faculdade de Direito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14295/juris.v28i2.8470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effective constitutional recognition of social rights, by itself, establishes—in any circumstance, even in times of economic crisis—a “hard” nucleus, unavailable to the various public and/or political agents and authorities (including the courts) in terms of meeting social demands, in a manner that this minimum will constitute, in the action of these various agents and authorities, including in the scope of the Public Administration’s actions, an insurmountable barrier that requires permanent boundaries and a certain integration between justice and politics, among judges, legislators and administrators. The judiciary, however, must guide its action by the search for possible mediation between guaranteeing the rights of all, the principle of separation of powers and balancing the budget.
社会权利作为基本权利与政策司法化:几点思考
宪法对社会权利的有效承认,就其本身而言,在任何情况下,甚至在经济危机时期,都建立了一个“硬”核心,在满足社会需求方面,各种公共和/或政治代理人和当局(包括法院)是无法获得的,以这种最低限度的方式,在这些各种代理人和当局的行动中,包括在公共行政的行动范围内。这是一个不可逾越的障碍,需要司法与政治之间、法官、立法者和行政人员之间的永久边界和某种程度的融合。然而,司法部门必须通过在保障所有人的权利、分权原则和平衡预算之间寻求可能的调解来指导其行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信