Modelling a manufacturer-retailers trade credit supply chain using game theory

P. Ezimadu, S. O. Ezimadu
{"title":"Modelling a manufacturer-retailers trade credit supply chain using game theory","authors":"P. Ezimadu, S. O. Ezimadu","doi":"10.4314/wojast.v14i1b.80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Game-theoretic trade credit models are quite scarce, especially in relation to product promotion. This work examined a trade credit supply chain involving a manufacturer and two retailers in a decentralised supply chain in which the retailers engage in product promotion while the manufacturer financed them through credit provision. It considered a supply chain structure in which the manufacturer provides trade credit to the retailers and a situation in which he does not provide trade credit. It used Stackelberg game theory to determine the optimal promotion efforts, the credit periods and the players’ payoffs, and showed that while the manufacturer is better-off with the retailers’ efforts, the retailers need to consciously determine appropriate optimal effort to avoid getting short-changed. It also showed that while credit period reduces with the manufacturer’s margin, it increases with a retailer’s margin. It further showed that while the retailers’ payoffs reduce continuously with credit period, the manufacturer’s payoff is fixed in the long-run irrespective of the credit period provided by the manufacturer to the retailers. By comparison the players as well as the channel perform better with the adoption of trade credit, however a retailer must avoid placing he price margin at equality with that of the manufacturer if he hopes to enjoy long credit period.","PeriodicalId":353187,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Applied Science & Technology","volume":"1725 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Applied Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/wojast.v14i1b.80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Game-theoretic trade credit models are quite scarce, especially in relation to product promotion. This work examined a trade credit supply chain involving a manufacturer and two retailers in a decentralised supply chain in which the retailers engage in product promotion while the manufacturer financed them through credit provision. It considered a supply chain structure in which the manufacturer provides trade credit to the retailers and a situation in which he does not provide trade credit. It used Stackelberg game theory to determine the optimal promotion efforts, the credit periods and the players’ payoffs, and showed that while the manufacturer is better-off with the retailers’ efforts, the retailers need to consciously determine appropriate optimal effort to avoid getting short-changed. It also showed that while credit period reduces with the manufacturer’s margin, it increases with a retailer’s margin. It further showed that while the retailers’ payoffs reduce continuously with credit period, the manufacturer’s payoff is fixed in the long-run irrespective of the credit period provided by the manufacturer to the retailers. By comparison the players as well as the channel perform better with the adoption of trade credit, however a retailer must avoid placing he price margin at equality with that of the manufacturer if he hopes to enjoy long credit period.
利用博弈论建立制造商-零售商贸易信贷供应链模型
博弈论的贸易信用模型相当缺乏,特别是与产品促销相关的模型。本研究考察了一个贸易信贷供应链,该供应链涉及一个制造商和两个分散供应链中的零售商,其中零售商从事产品促销,而制造商通过信贷提供资金。它考虑了制造商向零售商提供贸易信贷的供应链结构和制造商不提供贸易信贷的情况。运用Stackelberg博弈论确定了最优促销努力、信贷期限和参与者的收益,并表明当零售商的努力使制造商受益时,零售商需要有意识地确定适当的最优努力,以避免被少找。它还表明,虽然信贷期随着制造商的利润率而减少,但它随着零售商的利润率而增加。进一步表明,尽管零售商的收益随着信用期的增加而不断减少,但无论制造商提供给零售商的信用期有多长,其长期收益都是固定的。通过比较,参与者和渠道在采用贸易信贷后表现更好,然而,如果零售商希望享受较长的信贷期限,则必须避免将价格利润率与制造商相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信