Design efficacy at a distance: Collaboration between remote design teams

Farhad Mortezaee, B. Sinclair
{"title":"Design efficacy at a distance: Collaboration between remote design teams","authors":"Farhad Mortezaee, B. Sinclair","doi":"10.4995/vibrarch2022.2022.15225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design problems in the best instances are intensely complex and very demanding. Given that most buildings are unique -- that is, not mass-produced -- each design project must be considered as a precedent-setting experiment. While we learn from successes and failures, building projects remain distinct and demanding. Added to the conventional complexities is the distributed nature of design production in a globalized world. The present paper addresses several key queries: What are best practices in facilitating collaboration between remote design teams? What are the implications of working from home for design team members? While the practice of design has become increasingly digital, there are inherent tensions between the principals’ insistence to work in the tangibility of the physical studio and the younger practitioners’ preference to optimize flexibility via remote delivery. More significantly, what are the barriers and challenges to working on collaborative design projects globally, including but not limited to being overwhelmed by multi-tasking, power imbalances, different cultural dispositions, technical challenges, different time zones, data privacy and proprietary concerns, shifting from studio-based practice to online work, physical model making, communication pitfalls, screen burnout, and loss of personal/leisure time?  Such important yet perplexing questions loom large. The research involves literature reviews exploring the ways that design teams collaborate remotely. Building from this analysis, the paper delineates a number of familiar challenges and proffers solutions tackling design practice using remote teams. The research considers administration (design leaders and project managers) on one hand, and production (interdisciplinary design teams) on the other. Drawing upon organizational and human development theories, and utilizing the reflective practitioner’s approach, the paper situates discussion within broader topics of human dignity, workplace psychology, career mentorship, and continuing education. Also examined are architects’ persona, culture, practices and mindsets - crucial factors shaping the conduct of distributed design. Further, this paper elaborates on Zoom virtual collaboration platform with respect to suitability and effectiveness. In the end, a conceptual model and a setup for satellite studios for distributed design are proposed that aim improve communication, heighten collaboration and strengthen design in an increasingly complicated and interconnected ethos.","PeriodicalId":310465,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - 3rd Valencia International Biennial of Research in Architecture, VIBRArch","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - 3rd Valencia International Biennial of Research in Architecture, VIBRArch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/vibrarch2022.2022.15225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design problems in the best instances are intensely complex and very demanding. Given that most buildings are unique -- that is, not mass-produced -- each design project must be considered as a precedent-setting experiment. While we learn from successes and failures, building projects remain distinct and demanding. Added to the conventional complexities is the distributed nature of design production in a globalized world. The present paper addresses several key queries: What are best practices in facilitating collaboration between remote design teams? What are the implications of working from home for design team members? While the practice of design has become increasingly digital, there are inherent tensions between the principals’ insistence to work in the tangibility of the physical studio and the younger practitioners’ preference to optimize flexibility via remote delivery. More significantly, what are the barriers and challenges to working on collaborative design projects globally, including but not limited to being overwhelmed by multi-tasking, power imbalances, different cultural dispositions, technical challenges, different time zones, data privacy and proprietary concerns, shifting from studio-based practice to online work, physical model making, communication pitfalls, screen burnout, and loss of personal/leisure time?  Such important yet perplexing questions loom large. The research involves literature reviews exploring the ways that design teams collaborate remotely. Building from this analysis, the paper delineates a number of familiar challenges and proffers solutions tackling design practice using remote teams. The research considers administration (design leaders and project managers) on one hand, and production (interdisciplinary design teams) on the other. Drawing upon organizational and human development theories, and utilizing the reflective practitioner’s approach, the paper situates discussion within broader topics of human dignity, workplace psychology, career mentorship, and continuing education. Also examined are architects’ persona, culture, practices and mindsets - crucial factors shaping the conduct of distributed design. Further, this paper elaborates on Zoom virtual collaboration platform with respect to suitability and effectiveness. In the end, a conceptual model and a setup for satellite studios for distributed design are proposed that aim improve communication, heighten collaboration and strengthen design in an increasingly complicated and interconnected ethos.
远距离设计效能:远程设计团队之间的协作
在最好的情况下,设计问题是非常复杂和非常苛刻的。考虑到大多数建筑都是独一无二的,也就是说,不是大规模生产的,每个设计项目都必须被视为一个先例设定的实验。虽然我们从成功和失败中学习,但建设项目仍然是独特和苛刻的。在全球化的世界中,除了传统的复杂性之外,设计生产的分布式特性也增加了复杂性。本文提出了几个关键问题:促进远程设计团队之间协作的最佳实践是什么?对于设计团队成员来说,在家工作意味着什么?虽然设计实践变得越来越数字化,但在负责人坚持在有形的实体工作室工作与年轻从业者偏好通过远程交付优化灵活性之间存在固有的紧张关系。更重要的是,在全球范围内进行协作设计项目的障碍和挑战是什么,包括但不限于多任务、权力不平衡、不同的文化倾向、技术挑战、不同的时区、数据隐私和专有问题、从工作室实践转向在线工作、物理模型制作、沟通陷阱、屏幕倦怠以及个人/休闲时间的丧失?这些重要而又令人困惑的问题迫在眉睫。这项研究包括文献综述,探索设计团队远程协作的方式。基于此分析,本文描述了许多熟悉的挑战,并提供了使用远程团队处理设计实践的解决方案。这项研究一方面考虑了管理(设计领导者和项目经理),另一方面考虑了生产(跨学科设计团队)。根据组织和人类发展理论,并利用反思实践者的方法,本文将讨论置于人类尊严,工作场所心理学,职业指导和继续教育等更广泛的主题中。同时还考察了建筑师的个性、文化、实践和心态——这些都是塑造分布式设计行为的关键因素。进一步阐述了Zoom虚拟协作平台的适用性和有效性。最后,提出了分布式设计卫星工作室的概念模型和设置,旨在在日益复杂和相互关联的环境中改善沟通,加强协作和加强设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信