Browsing thumbnails: a comparison of three techniques

A. Hedman, D. A. Carr, H. Nassla
{"title":"Browsing thumbnails: a comparison of three techniques","authors":"A. Hedman, D. A. Carr, H. Nassla","doi":"10.1109/ITI.2004.241876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conducted a usability study comparing three different browser alternatives (iconic, zoom-and-pan, and fisheye) for an electronic bulletin board containing thumbnails of notes. The iconic browser behaves in the manner of a standard windowing system. The zoom-and-pan browser allows the user to pan over a note and zoom to a readable size. The fisheye browser was an implementation of the bifocal view. We conducted an experiment where 21 subjects performed browsing tasks with each browser. We found that users performed best with the iconic browser and that young people (20-25) were significantly faster than older (31-53)","PeriodicalId":320305,"journal":{"name":"26th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, 2004.","volume":"08 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"26th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITI.2004.241876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

We conducted a usability study comparing three different browser alternatives (iconic, zoom-and-pan, and fisheye) for an electronic bulletin board containing thumbnails of notes. The iconic browser behaves in the manner of a standard windowing system. The zoom-and-pan browser allows the user to pan over a note and zoom to a readable size. The fisheye browser was an implementation of the bifocal view. We conducted an experiment where 21 subjects performed browsing tasks with each browser. We found that users performed best with the iconic browser and that young people (20-25) were significantly faster than older (31-53)
浏览缩略图:三种技术的比较
我们进行了一项可用性研究,比较了包含笔记缩略图的电子公告板的三种不同的浏览器选择(图标、缩放和鱼眼)。图标浏览器以标准窗口系统的方式运行。缩放平移浏览器允许用户平移笔记并缩放到可读的大小。鱼眼浏览器是双焦点视图的实现。我们进行了一项实验,让21名受试者使用每种浏览器进行浏览任务。我们发现,使用这款标志性浏览器的用户表现最好,年轻人(20-25岁)的速度明显快于年龄较大的人(31-53岁)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信