14. Federalism

J. McEldowney
{"title":"14. Federalism","authors":"J. McEldowney","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198806363.003.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Federalism, to date, has proved unattractive to the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom is commonly described as a unitary state, whereby governmental power is primarily exercised through a sovereign Parliament at Westminster. The UK may be distinguished from Federal countries, notably the United States or Germany. In federal systems, sovereign power is shared between the federal government and the states. However, the description of the United Kingdom as a unitary state is an oversimplification as there are many instances of devolved, shared and autonomous powers that do not easily fit under a centralized view of the state. These ‘quasi-federal’ elements of the constitution arise through the UK Parliament delegating to regional and local communities a variety of powers and responsibilities through elected local and municipal authorities as well as devolved ‘deals’. Since 1989, powers have been distributed to the four nations of the United Kingdom: England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland through extensive, and increasing, devolved powers (devolution) including a variety of tax-raising powers. There is also a London Assembly with devolved powers. The future of the UK after Brexit is uncertain and there are deep divisions of opinion. England and Wales voted for Brexit while London, Northern Ireland and Scotland voted to remain within the EU. Different constitutional configurations were suggested for the four nations, during the nineteenth century, including federalism, Irish home rule and independence as well as strengthening local government. No exact definition of federalism emerged from the different variations supported at one time or another during this period. Consequently supporters of federalism have struggled to have a single configuration to make their case. Overall federalism was rejected as inconsistent with the orthodoxy of a unitary state formed from an incorporating union centred around a sovereign Parliament. Has the extent of substantial devolved and delegated powers reached a tipping point that places a form of divisible federalism as a way of addressing current concerns and controversies including Brexit? Any formal adoption of federalism would alter the role of the UK Supreme Court as well as future relations with the EU after Brexit. Federalism might provide a mechanism for a changing unitary state to address 21st-century challenges amidst a perceptible shift to a ‘quasi-federal’ state with devolved governments and many shared or delegated powers.","PeriodicalId":173423,"journal":{"name":"The Changing Constitution","volume":"1478 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Changing Constitution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198806363.003.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Federalism, to date, has proved unattractive to the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom is commonly described as a unitary state, whereby governmental power is primarily exercised through a sovereign Parliament at Westminster. The UK may be distinguished from Federal countries, notably the United States or Germany. In federal systems, sovereign power is shared between the federal government and the states. However, the description of the United Kingdom as a unitary state is an oversimplification as there are many instances of devolved, shared and autonomous powers that do not easily fit under a centralized view of the state. These ‘quasi-federal’ elements of the constitution arise through the UK Parliament delegating to regional and local communities a variety of powers and responsibilities through elected local and municipal authorities as well as devolved ‘deals’. Since 1989, powers have been distributed to the four nations of the United Kingdom: England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland through extensive, and increasing, devolved powers (devolution) including a variety of tax-raising powers. There is also a London Assembly with devolved powers. The future of the UK after Brexit is uncertain and there are deep divisions of opinion. England and Wales voted for Brexit while London, Northern Ireland and Scotland voted to remain within the EU. Different constitutional configurations were suggested for the four nations, during the nineteenth century, including federalism, Irish home rule and independence as well as strengthening local government. No exact definition of federalism emerged from the different variations supported at one time or another during this period. Consequently supporters of federalism have struggled to have a single configuration to make their case. Overall federalism was rejected as inconsistent with the orthodoxy of a unitary state formed from an incorporating union centred around a sovereign Parliament. Has the extent of substantial devolved and delegated powers reached a tipping point that places a form of divisible federalism as a way of addressing current concerns and controversies including Brexit? Any formal adoption of federalism would alter the role of the UK Supreme Court as well as future relations with the EU after Brexit. Federalism might provide a mechanism for a changing unitary state to address 21st-century challenges amidst a perceptible shift to a ‘quasi-federal’ state with devolved governments and many shared or delegated powers.
14. 联邦制
迄今为止,联邦制已被证明对英国没有吸引力。联合王国通常被描述为一个单一制国家,政府权力主要通过威斯敏斯特的主权议会行使。英国可能不同于联邦制国家,尤其是美国或德国。在联邦制中,主权由联邦政府和各州共享。然而,将联合王国描述为一个单一制国家是一种过于简单化的说法,因为有许多下放、共享和自治的权力,这些权力不容易符合中央集权的国家观点。宪法的这些“准联邦”元素是通过英国议会通过选举产生的地方和市政当局以及下放的“协议”,将各种权力和责任委托给地区和地方社区而产生的。自1989年以来,通过广泛且不断增加的权力下放(devolution),包括各种增税权,权力被分配给联合王国的四个国家:英格兰、苏格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰。还有一个权力下放的伦敦议会。英国脱欧后的未来是不确定的,存在深刻的意见分歧。英格兰和威尔士投票支持脱欧,而伦敦、北爱尔兰和苏格兰投票支持留在欧盟。在19世纪,这四个国家提出了不同的宪法结构,包括联邦制、爱尔兰自治和独立以及加强地方政府。在这一时期,从不同时期支持的不同变体中,没有出现联邦制的确切定义。因此,联邦制的支持者一直在努力争取一个单一的结构来证明他们的观点。整体的联邦制被拒绝,因为它不符合统一国家的正统观念,即由一个以主权议会为中心的合并联盟形成。实质性的权力下放和授权的程度是否达到了一个临界点,以至于将一种可分割的联邦制形式作为解决包括英国退欧在内的当前担忧和争议的一种方式?任何对联邦制的正式采用都将改变英国最高法院的角色,以及英国退欧后与欧盟的未来关系。联邦制可能会为一个变化中的单一制国家提供一种机制,以应对21世纪的挑战,同时向一个分权政府和许多共享或授权权力的“准联邦制”国家转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信