Americans and Their Forests: Romanticism, Progress, and Science in the Late Nineteenth Century

T. Cox
{"title":"Americans and Their Forests: Romanticism, Progress, and Science in the Late Nineteenth Century","authors":"T. Cox","doi":"10.2307/4004710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he attitudes of Americans toward their country's natural resources were widely disparate as the second half of the nineteenth century began. They continued to be so in the years that followed. Until the midnineteenth century, two major aesthetic and social theories dominated Americans' approaches to their natural environment. Romantic artists and philosophers, and later wealthy tourists, sought sublimity and uplift in the contemplation of nature, linking nature and the divine. On the other hand, the yeoman ideal articulated by Thomas Jefferson emphasized the productive use of nature, specifically the clearing and cultivation of the wilderness, as the foundation of democracy and national prosperity. These viewpoints long molded American policies toward the forests, not according to an understanding of nature's capacities and limitations, but to meet social and political ideals. In the latter half of the nineteenth century, however, the scientific approach, championed by George Perkins Marsh and others, gradually gained acceptance. Realities came to replace egalitarian concepts as the primary factor shaping forest policy. After the turn of the century, contending interests, battling for implementation of mutually exclusive policies, found it increasingly necessary to cast their arguments in rational, scientific terms. Romantic literature and","PeriodicalId":246151,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forest History","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forest History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4004710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

T he attitudes of Americans toward their country's natural resources were widely disparate as the second half of the nineteenth century began. They continued to be so in the years that followed. Until the midnineteenth century, two major aesthetic and social theories dominated Americans' approaches to their natural environment. Romantic artists and philosophers, and later wealthy tourists, sought sublimity and uplift in the contemplation of nature, linking nature and the divine. On the other hand, the yeoman ideal articulated by Thomas Jefferson emphasized the productive use of nature, specifically the clearing and cultivation of the wilderness, as the foundation of democracy and national prosperity. These viewpoints long molded American policies toward the forests, not according to an understanding of nature's capacities and limitations, but to meet social and political ideals. In the latter half of the nineteenth century, however, the scientific approach, championed by George Perkins Marsh and others, gradually gained acceptance. Realities came to replace egalitarian concepts as the primary factor shaping forest policy. After the turn of the century, contending interests, battling for implementation of mutually exclusive policies, found it increasingly necessary to cast their arguments in rational, scientific terms. Romantic literature and
美国人和他们的森林:19世纪晚期的浪漫主义、进步和科学
19世纪下半叶开始时,美国人对本国自然资源的态度大相径庭。在接下来的几年里,他们一直如此。直到19世纪中叶,两种主要的美学和社会理论主导了美国人对自然环境的看法。浪漫主义艺术家和哲学家,以及后来富有的游客,在对自然的沉思中寻求崇高和升华,将自然与神联系起来。另一方面,托马斯·杰斐逊提出的自耕农理想强调对自然的有效利用,特别是对荒野的清理和开垦,作为民主和国家繁荣的基础。这些观点长期以来塑造了美国对森林的政策,不是基于对自然能力和局限性的理解,而是为了满足社会和政治理想。然而,在19世纪后半叶,由乔治·帕金斯·马什等人倡导的科学方法逐渐被人们所接受。现实取代了平等主义概念,成为形成森林政策的主要因素。世纪之交之后,相互竞争的利益,为实施相互排斥的政策而斗争,发现越来越有必要用理性、科学的术语来表达他们的观点。浪漫主义文学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信