Cross-fields Study of Modularity

Jinghua Li, Lu Yan
{"title":"Cross-fields Study of Modularity","authors":"Jinghua Li, Lu Yan","doi":"10.1109/ICMIT.2006.262288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modularity is the key way of innovation and mass customization, and it is the process of decomposition and integration of whole object in logic. The situation of modularity is in a middle section of the complexity continuum. While study modular innovation in service product and process, we found there are many fields employed modularity, such as economics, psychology, design, and production, etc. In this paper, we investigate its common characteristics in cross-fields. Firstly, we establish a cross-fields union framework for modularity analysis based on multi-fields, which including function, structure, and interaction aspects. This framework is different from Baldwin and Clark's modularity 1-2-3 for purpose. Secondly, the common and difference of modularity in different social sciences are investigated, which involving labor division and industrial organization in economics, modularity cognition in psychology, and structuralism theory in sociology, etc. Thirdly, the common and difference of modularity in different nature sciences are investigated too, which involving electron industry, software engineering and OOP in software development, standardization and modular manufacture in machine, etc. Finally, we summarize the conclusions and hints under union framework. We found bus modularity is more common in cross-fields in Ulrich's modularity classification. And modularity is the signal of struggle between structuralism and synthesis thought. There are amalgamation trend while the development of modularity","PeriodicalId":431021,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIT.2006.262288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Modularity is the key way of innovation and mass customization, and it is the process of decomposition and integration of whole object in logic. The situation of modularity is in a middle section of the complexity continuum. While study modular innovation in service product and process, we found there are many fields employed modularity, such as economics, psychology, design, and production, etc. In this paper, we investigate its common characteristics in cross-fields. Firstly, we establish a cross-fields union framework for modularity analysis based on multi-fields, which including function, structure, and interaction aspects. This framework is different from Baldwin and Clark's modularity 1-2-3 for purpose. Secondly, the common and difference of modularity in different social sciences are investigated, which involving labor division and industrial organization in economics, modularity cognition in psychology, and structuralism theory in sociology, etc. Thirdly, the common and difference of modularity in different nature sciences are investigated too, which involving electron industry, software engineering and OOP in software development, standardization and modular manufacture in machine, etc. Finally, we summarize the conclusions and hints under union framework. We found bus modularity is more common in cross-fields in Ulrich's modularity classification. And modularity is the signal of struggle between structuralism and synthesis thought. There are amalgamation trend while the development of modularity
模块化的跨领域研究
模块化是创新和大规模定制的关键途径,是整体对象在逻辑上的分解和集成过程。模块化的情况处于复杂性连续体的中间部分。在研究服务产品和服务流程的模块化创新时,我们发现许多领域都采用了模块化,如经济学、心理学、设计、生产等。本文探讨了其在交叉领域中的共同特征。首先,建立了基于多领域的模块化分析跨领域联合框架,包括功能、结构和交互三个方面;这个框架在目的上不同于Baldwin和Clark的模块化1-2-3。其次,从经济学的分工与产业组织、心理学的模块化认知、社会学的结构主义理论等方面考察了不同社会科学中模块化理论的异同。第三,分析了不同自然科学中模块化的异同,包括电子工业、软件工程和面向对象软件开发、标准化和机械模块化制造等。最后,总结了联合框架下的结论和提示。在Ulrich的模块化分类中,我们发现总线模块化在跨领域中更为常见。模块化是结构主义与综合思想斗争的标志。模块化发展的同时也有融合的趋势
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信