Potential defaults of anthropometric assessment parameters during pregnancy

M. Santana, R. Pereira, Eunice Oliveira, H. Almeida, R. Ascenso
{"title":"Potential defaults of anthropometric assessment parameters during pregnancy","authors":"M. Santana, R. Pereira, Eunice Oliveira, H. Almeida, R. Ascenso","doi":"10.24243/jmeb/2.5.176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pregnancy is one of the most common life events, surprisingly little systematic and scientific information is available in the literature when considering anthropometrics. Studies regarding the pregnant’s body size variation, namely for the design of clothes during gestation are quit common. But anthropometrics is a lot more, it is also a science that aids in characterizing the body morphology and composition of humans. There are standard data of anthropometric parameters for specific populations, however, it doesn’t seem to exist any specific values or data for pregnant women. Neither the indication to use the standard values is mentioned or stated. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to evaluate if the default data and the current anthropometric tools are appropriate to be used on pregnant women. In this study, we analysed and evaluated the morphologic characterization and the body composition of pregnant women using existing anthropometric restricted profile methods. The tools considered in this study were: Body Mass Index, Somatotype, Conicity Index, AbdominalHip Ratio and Waist-Height Ratio. Some tools do not demonstrate efficiency in the anthropometric evaluation such as Body Mass Index by placing the pregnant women within risk levels that do not correspond to reality. However, other methods are plausible to be used, such as Conicity, Index Abdominal-Hip and Waist-Height Ratios were the values obtained within the expected range. In conclusion, the existing anthropometric tools need further study when characterizing pregnant women. DOI: https:/doi.org/10.24243/JMEB/2.5.176 2018. Published by Rational Publication. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. Research Article","PeriodicalId":185140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Biomechanics","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24243/jmeb/2.5.176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pregnancy is one of the most common life events, surprisingly little systematic and scientific information is available in the literature when considering anthropometrics. Studies regarding the pregnant’s body size variation, namely for the design of clothes during gestation are quit common. But anthropometrics is a lot more, it is also a science that aids in characterizing the body morphology and composition of humans. There are standard data of anthropometric parameters for specific populations, however, it doesn’t seem to exist any specific values or data for pregnant women. Neither the indication to use the standard values is mentioned or stated. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to evaluate if the default data and the current anthropometric tools are appropriate to be used on pregnant women. In this study, we analysed and evaluated the morphologic characterization and the body composition of pregnant women using existing anthropometric restricted profile methods. The tools considered in this study were: Body Mass Index, Somatotype, Conicity Index, AbdominalHip Ratio and Waist-Height Ratio. Some tools do not demonstrate efficiency in the anthropometric evaluation such as Body Mass Index by placing the pregnant women within risk levels that do not correspond to reality. However, other methods are plausible to be used, such as Conicity, Index Abdominal-Hip and Waist-Height Ratios were the values obtained within the expected range. In conclusion, the existing anthropometric tools need further study when characterizing pregnant women. DOI: https:/doi.org/10.24243/JMEB/2.5.176 2018. Published by Rational Publication. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. Research Article
妊娠期人体测量评估参数的潜在缺陷
怀孕是最常见的生活事件之一,令人惊讶的是,在考虑人体测量学时,文献中几乎没有系统和科学的信息。关于孕妇体型变化的研究,即孕期服装设计的研究并不多见。但是人体测量学不仅仅是这样,它也是一门帮助描述人体形态和组成的科学。有针对特定人群的人体测量参数的标准数据,但似乎没有针对孕妇的特定值或数据。没有提及或说明使用标准值的指示。因此,本研究的主要目的是评估默认数据和当前人体测量工具是否适合用于孕妇。在这项研究中,我们使用现有的人体测量限制剖面方法分析和评估了孕妇的形态特征和身体组成。本研究考虑的工具是:体重指数、体型、圆锥度指数、腹臀比和腰高比。一些工具在人体测量评估中没有显示出效率,如身体质量指数,因为它们将孕妇置于与现实不符的风险水平内。然而,其他的方法是合理的使用,如圆锥度,指数腹臀比和腰高比是在预期范围内获得的值。总之,现有的人体测量工具在描述孕妇特征时需要进一步研究。DOI: https:/doi.org/10.24243/JMEB/2.5.176 2018。由Rational Publication发布。本作品采用知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议。要查看本许可协议的副本,请访问https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/或致函美国山景城CA 94042邮政信箱1866号创用cc。研究文章
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信