Effectiveness of certain safety commercial nematicides compare with a chemical nematicide Carbofuran for controlling M. incognita infected pomegranate plants

M. Abo-Korah
{"title":"Effectiveness of certain safety commercial nematicides compare with a chemical nematicide Carbofuran for controlling M. incognita infected pomegranate plants","authors":"M. Abo-Korah","doi":"10.21608/ijsrsd.2022.234165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the growing environmental awareness, the identification of the dangers of chemical nematicides and the tendency of scientists to use safety nematicides, this study was determined to compare the effectiveness of three safety nematicides : Bio-arc (a commercial formulation Bacillus megaterium ), Mycorrhizae (a commercial formulation of the Glomus mosseae ) and Nemastrol (a commercial formulation of active ingredients) singly or in combination and the nematicide Carbofuran on root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita infected pomegranate seedlings under open field conditions. In addition to its effect on the vegetative characteristics of pomegranate , and the rates of both peroxidase (PO) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzymes in the roots of the pomegranate plants. Results show that, there are significant differences among all treatments. Nematicide Carbofuran gave the highest reduction percentages of M. incognita juvenile (83.0%), superior to that of safety commercial nematicides singly recording 66.4%, 64.3% and 60.3% for Nemastrol , Mycorrhizae and Bio-arc, respectively , compared to the control. M. slightly more reduced the mature females, egg masses and root galls by (83.1, 86.1 and 80.0%) respectively, compared to Carbofuran (81.1, 85.0 and 80.0%) respectively. Binary treatments also improved the vegetative characteristics of pomegranate seedlings compared with Carbofuran, as it led to an increase in plant height, shoot weight and root weight by percentages 56.8, 40.2 and 87.2%, while it increased by Carbofuran treatment as 52.6, 40.0 and 80.0%, respectively compared with control. As well as binary treatments led to increase peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase enzyme rates by (10.3 and 9.5%) respectively, compared with control. Therefore, it could be recommend use these safety agents in binary treatments in integrated control programs for controlling root-knot nematodes that infect pomegranate plants because their greater effect than individually treatment producing better results than chemical nematicide.","PeriodicalId":137669,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and Science","volume":"2013 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ijsrsd.2022.234165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the growing environmental awareness, the identification of the dangers of chemical nematicides and the tendency of scientists to use safety nematicides, this study was determined to compare the effectiveness of three safety nematicides : Bio-arc (a commercial formulation Bacillus megaterium ), Mycorrhizae (a commercial formulation of the Glomus mosseae ) and Nemastrol (a commercial formulation of active ingredients) singly or in combination and the nematicide Carbofuran on root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita infected pomegranate seedlings under open field conditions. In addition to its effect on the vegetative characteristics of pomegranate , and the rates of both peroxidase (PO) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzymes in the roots of the pomegranate plants. Results show that, there are significant differences among all treatments. Nematicide Carbofuran gave the highest reduction percentages of M. incognita juvenile (83.0%), superior to that of safety commercial nematicides singly recording 66.4%, 64.3% and 60.3% for Nemastrol , Mycorrhizae and Bio-arc, respectively , compared to the control. M. slightly more reduced the mature females, egg masses and root galls by (83.1, 86.1 and 80.0%) respectively, compared to Carbofuran (81.1, 85.0 and 80.0%) respectively. Binary treatments also improved the vegetative characteristics of pomegranate seedlings compared with Carbofuran, as it led to an increase in plant height, shoot weight and root weight by percentages 56.8, 40.2 and 87.2%, while it increased by Carbofuran treatment as 52.6, 40.0 and 80.0%, respectively compared with control. As well as binary treatments led to increase peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase enzyme rates by (10.3 and 9.5%) respectively, compared with control. Therefore, it could be recommend use these safety agents in binary treatments in integrated control programs for controlling root-knot nematodes that infect pomegranate plants because their greater effect than individually treatment producing better results than chemical nematicide.
某些安全的市售杀线虫剂与化学杀线虫剂Carbofuran防治石榴黑僵菌的效果比较
随着人们环保意识的增强、对化学杀线虫剂危害的认识以及科学家倾向于使用安全杀线虫剂,本研究确定比较三种安全杀线虫剂的有效性:生物弧菌(巨型芽孢杆菌的商业配方)、菌根菌(苔藓球囊菌的商业配方)和Nemastrol(有效成分的商业配方)单独或联合使用,以及杀线虫剂Carbofuran,在露天条件下对受根结线虫感染的石榴幼苗有效。此外,它还影响石榴的营养特性,以及石榴根系中过氧化物酶(PO)和多酚氧化酶(PPO)酶的含量。结果表明,各处理间存在显著性差异。杀线虫剂Carbofuran对黑纹夜蛾幼虫的抑制率最高(83.0%),优于单纯安全的商用杀线虫剂,分别对nemaastrol、菌根菌和生物弧菌的抑制率分别为66.4%、64.3%和60.3%。M.对成熟雌虫、卵块和根瘿的抑制作用分别为83.1、86.1和80.0%,而Carbofuran的抑制作用分别为81.1、85.0和80.0%。与呋喃丹相比,二元处理也改善了石榴幼苗的营养特性,其株高、茎重和根重的增幅分别为56.8%、40.2和87.2%,而呋喃丹处理的增幅分别为52.6、40.0%和80.0%。与对照相比,双重处理可使过氧化物酶和多酚氧化酶的酶率分别提高(10.3和9.5%)。因此,在防治石榴根结线虫的综合防治方案中,可以推荐使用这些安全药剂,因为它们比单独处理效果好,效果比化学杀线虫剂好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信