«God is dead» as an apophatic text of the borderline consciousness

I. Yedoshina
{"title":"«God is dead» as an apophatic text of the borderline consciousness","authors":"I. Yedoshina","doi":"10.31249/hoc/2021.02.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main theme of the article is the borderline conscious-ness; the subject is the novella «God Is Dead» (1922) by S. D. Krzhizhanovsky as a reflection of the borderline consciousness. The purpose of the article is to reveal the specifics of the borderline conscious-ness in general and its features in the culture of the late 19 th and early 20 th centuries using the example of the analysis of the novella «God Is Dead», as well as of other texts similar in content and the time of writing. The main methods are ontological, historical-cultural, analytical, and com-parative. The introductory part defines the main characteristics of the bor-derline consciousness and also clarifies the etymology and the immanence of the process in development of the human society. Further, the author of the article identifies the substantive aspects in the concept of «apophati-cism», draws on the names of philosophers that are relevant to the thoughts of S. D. Krzhizhanovsky, (F. Nietzsche, A. Schweitzer, M. Heidegger), emphasizes that negation has nothing to do with God, from the point of view of Dionysius the Areopagite. The common and different aspects of philosophical and artistic views on apophaticism are also analyzed (F. Nietzsche, K. K. Sluchevsky). Further, the researcher carries out a de-tailed analysis of the novella «God Is Dead»by S. D. Krzhizhanovsky: the compositional structure is examined, an overview of the characters and their peculiarities is given, biblical and artistic allusions, their correlation with the specificity of the Soviet regime are revealed. The author of the article specially emphasizes that S. D. Krzhizhanovsky resorts to apophaticism as a characteristic of this time. The polemic part designates different approaches in the modern interpretation of apophaticism in the novella by S. D. Krzhizhanovsky, which do not coincide with the understanding of the author of this article. In the final observations, it is emphasized: the border-line consciousness thinks within the boundaries, which is reflected in art and outlook on the world.","PeriodicalId":256945,"journal":{"name":"Herald of Culturology","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of Culturology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31249/hoc/2021.02.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main theme of the article is the borderline conscious-ness; the subject is the novella «God Is Dead» (1922) by S. D. Krzhizhanovsky as a reflection of the borderline consciousness. The purpose of the article is to reveal the specifics of the borderline conscious-ness in general and its features in the culture of the late 19 th and early 20 th centuries using the example of the analysis of the novella «God Is Dead», as well as of other texts similar in content and the time of writing. The main methods are ontological, historical-cultural, analytical, and com-parative. The introductory part defines the main characteristics of the bor-derline consciousness and also clarifies the etymology and the immanence of the process in development of the human society. Further, the author of the article identifies the substantive aspects in the concept of «apophati-cism», draws on the names of philosophers that are relevant to the thoughts of S. D. Krzhizhanovsky, (F. Nietzsche, A. Schweitzer, M. Heidegger), emphasizes that negation has nothing to do with God, from the point of view of Dionysius the Areopagite. The common and different aspects of philosophical and artistic views on apophaticism are also analyzed (F. Nietzsche, K. K. Sluchevsky). Further, the researcher carries out a de-tailed analysis of the novella «God Is Dead»by S. D. Krzhizhanovsky: the compositional structure is examined, an overview of the characters and their peculiarities is given, biblical and artistic allusions, their correlation with the specificity of the Soviet regime are revealed. The author of the article specially emphasizes that S. D. Krzhizhanovsky resorts to apophaticism as a characteristic of this time. The polemic part designates different approaches in the modern interpretation of apophaticism in the novella by S. D. Krzhizhanovsky, which do not coincide with the understanding of the author of this article. In the final observations, it is emphasized: the border-line consciousness thinks within the boundaries, which is reflected in art and outlook on the world.
“上帝死了”作为一种边缘意识的冷漠文本
本文的主题是边缘性意识;主题是s·d·克日扎诺夫斯基的中篇小说《上帝已死》(1922),作为对边缘意识的反映。本文的目的是通过对中篇小说《上帝已死》的分析,以及其他在内容和写作时间上类似的文本,揭示19世纪末和20世纪初文化中边缘意识的一般细节及其特征。主要方法有本体论、历史文化、分析和比较。引言部分界定了边缘性意识的主要特征,并阐明了边缘性意识的词源及其在人类社会发展过程中的内在性。此外,文章的作者确定了“否定主义”概念的实质性方面,引用了与S. D. krzhzhanovsky (F. Nietzsche, A. Schweitzer, M. Heidegger)思想相关的哲学家的名字,强调否定与上帝无关,从狄奥尼修斯的观点来看。分析了哲学和艺术对避光主义的共同观点和不同观点(F.尼采,K. K. Sluchevsky)。此外,研究人员对S. D. krzhzhanovsky的中篇小说《上帝已死》进行了详细的分析:检查了其组成结构,概述了人物及其特点,揭示了圣经和艺术典喻,以及他们与苏维埃政权特殊性的相关性。本文作者特别强调,krzhzhanovsky在这一时期的特点是诉诸于冷漠主义。辩论性部分指出了krzhzhanovsky中篇小说中避语主义的不同现代解读方法,这些方法与本文作者的理解并不一致。在最后的观察中强调:边界意识在边界内思考,这体现在艺术和世界观上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信