The Influence of Education and Environment on Patient-Reported Outcome Use in Athletic Training Clinical Practice

J. Howard, J. Hoch, J. Tinsley, Aaron D. Sciascia
{"title":"The Influence of Education and Environment on Patient-Reported Outcome Use in Athletic Training Clinical Practice","authors":"J. Howard, J. Hoch, J. Tinsley, Aaron D. Sciascia","doi":"10.4085/1947-380x-20-76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n There have been multiple education reforms aimed at incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into routine clinical care. However, many factors can impact PROM use, including employment setting/policies or access to literature.\n \n \n \n To explore the influence of educational background and employment setting/policies on athletic trainer (AT) attitudes and practices related to PROM use in the secondary and collegiate settings.\n \n \n \n Cross-sectional survey.\n \n \n \n Secondary schools; National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I, II, and III; National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics; and junior colleges.\n \n \n \n Five hundred and seven ATs working in secondary and collegiate settings.\n \n \n \n An established scale evaluating attitudes toward PROMs was distributed to a purposeful sample of 4000 ATs. Also included were questions concerning use of PROMs, employer policies related to PROMs, access to non–National Athletic Trainers' Association (NATA) journals, and educational background. Scores on each scale were compared based on educational background, employment setting/policies, and access to non-NATA scientific journals using Kruskal-Wallis tests with a Bonferroni correction. Frequency of PROM use was evaluated using chi-square tests (α = .05).\n \n \n \n PROMs were viewed positively across all participants, with more positive attitudes toward PROMs observed among those with clinical doctorates (P = .029) compared to those with master's or bachelor's degrees and by those with an athletic training-–related postprofessional master's degree (P = .030) compared to a non–athletic training master's degree. There were no differences in attitudes based on timing of professional degree completion. There were no differences in the usage of PROMs based on educational background or employment setting, with only 10% of respondents reporting routine PROM use. However, access to non-NATA scientific journals (P = .016) and employer policies related to the use of PROMs were associated with increased use of PROMs (P < .001).\n \n \n \n Educational reforms have enhanced the attitudes of practicing ATs toward PROMs; however, environmental facilitators, such as expanded access to scientific literature and policies regarding the use of PROMs, are necessary to increase the use of PROMs.\n","PeriodicalId":448792,"journal":{"name":"Athletic training education journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Athletic training education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1947-380x-20-76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There have been multiple education reforms aimed at incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into routine clinical care. However, many factors can impact PROM use, including employment setting/policies or access to literature. To explore the influence of educational background and employment setting/policies on athletic trainer (AT) attitudes and practices related to PROM use in the secondary and collegiate settings. Cross-sectional survey. Secondary schools; National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I, II, and III; National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics; and junior colleges. Five hundred and seven ATs working in secondary and collegiate settings. An established scale evaluating attitudes toward PROMs was distributed to a purposeful sample of 4000 ATs. Also included were questions concerning use of PROMs, employer policies related to PROMs, access to non–National Athletic Trainers' Association (NATA) journals, and educational background. Scores on each scale were compared based on educational background, employment setting/policies, and access to non-NATA scientific journals using Kruskal-Wallis tests with a Bonferroni correction. Frequency of PROM use was evaluated using chi-square tests (α = .05). PROMs were viewed positively across all participants, with more positive attitudes toward PROMs observed among those with clinical doctorates (P = .029) compared to those with master's or bachelor's degrees and by those with an athletic training-–related postprofessional master's degree (P = .030) compared to a non–athletic training master's degree. There were no differences in attitudes based on timing of professional degree completion. There were no differences in the usage of PROMs based on educational background or employment setting, with only 10% of respondents reporting routine PROM use. However, access to non-NATA scientific journals (P = .016) and employer policies related to the use of PROMs were associated with increased use of PROMs (P < .001). Educational reforms have enhanced the attitudes of practicing ATs toward PROMs; however, environmental facilitators, such as expanded access to scientific literature and policies regarding the use of PROMs, are necessary to increase the use of PROMs.
教育和环境对运动训练临床实践中患者报告结果使用的影响
已经进行了多项教育改革,旨在将患者报告的结果措施(PROMs)纳入常规临床护理。然而,许多因素会影响PROM的使用,包括就业设置/政策或获取文献。探讨教育背景和就业环境/政策对中学和大学环境中运动教练(AT)使用PROM的态度和行为的影响。横断面调查。中学;全国大学体育协会I、II、III分部;全国校际体育协会;还有大专院校。在中学和大学环境中工作的557名助教。一个已建立的评估对prom态度的量表被分发给有目的的4000个ATs样本。另外还包括了关于prom的使用、与prom相关的雇主政策、获取非国家运动训练员协会(NATA)期刊和教育背景的问题。每个量表的得分根据教育背景、就业环境/政策和非nata科学期刊的获取情况进行比较,使用带有Bonferroni校正的Kruskal-Wallis测试。采用卡方检验评价胎膜PROM的使用频率(α = 0.05)。所有参与者都积极地看待PROMs,与硕士或学士学位相比,拥有临床博士学位的人(P = 0.029)对PROMs的态度更为积极,与非运动训练硕士学位相比,拥有运动训练相关的专业后硕士学位的人(P = 0.030)对PROMs的态度更为积极。在完成专业学位的时间上,态度没有差异。在基于教育背景或就业环境的PROM使用方面没有差异,只有10%的受访者报告常规PROM使用。然而,获取非nata科学期刊(P = 0.016)和与prom使用相关的雇主政策与prom使用增加相关(P < 0.001)。教育改革提高了实习ATs对prom的态度;但是,环境促进因素,例如扩大获取科学文献的机会和关于使用有机材料的政策,对于增加有机材料的使用是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信