FACULTY RATINGS of Retention Strategies for Minority Nursing Students

Barbara H Baker
{"title":"FACULTY RATINGS of Retention Strategies for Minority Nursing Students","authors":"Barbara H Baker","doi":"10.1043/1536-5026-31.4.216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to investigate a) the types of retention strategies used by undergraduate nursing programs for the purpose of retaining minority students, b) the rated effectiveness of the strategies, as identified by faculty in those programs, and c) whether there is a relationship between strategies rated as effective and the type of nursing program, baccalaureate (BSN) or associate (AD) degree. Administrator‐selected faculty from randomly sampled BSN and AD nursing programs within a 16‐state area of the southeastern United States were asked to respond to an online survey regarding the use and effectiveness of retention strategies selected from the literature. Descriptive statistics and chi‐square tests for association were used to analyze the data. Of the 14 strategies included in this analysis, faculty availability and timely feedback on tests and clinical performances were used by all undergraduate programs. Organized study groups and peer mentoring were the least used strategies. Faculty from both BSN and AD programs reported using many of the strategies and rated their use as effective overall for minority nursing student retention. The highest rated strategies were those that involved direct interaction of nurse faculty and students.","PeriodicalId":153271,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Education Perspective","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Education Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1043/1536-5026-31.4.216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to investigate a) the types of retention strategies used by undergraduate nursing programs for the purpose of retaining minority students, b) the rated effectiveness of the strategies, as identified by faculty in those programs, and c) whether there is a relationship between strategies rated as effective and the type of nursing program, baccalaureate (BSN) or associate (AD) degree. Administrator‐selected faculty from randomly sampled BSN and AD nursing programs within a 16‐state area of the southeastern United States were asked to respond to an online survey regarding the use and effectiveness of retention strategies selected from the literature. Descriptive statistics and chi‐square tests for association were used to analyze the data. Of the 14 strategies included in this analysis, faculty availability and timely feedback on tests and clinical performances were used by all undergraduate programs. Organized study groups and peer mentoring were the least used strategies. Faculty from both BSN and AD programs reported using many of the strategies and rated their use as effective overall for minority nursing student retention. The highest rated strategies were those that involved direct interaction of nurse faculty and students.
少数民族护理专业学生保留策略的教师评价
本研究的目的是调查a)本科护理专业为留住少数民族学生而使用的保留策略类型,b)这些策略的有效性,由这些项目的教师确定,以及c)被评为有效的策略与护理项目类型,学士学位(BSN)或副学士学位(AD)之间是否存在关系。从美国东南部16个州的BSN和AD护理项目中随机抽取的管理人员,被要求对一项关于从文献中选择的保留策略的使用和有效性的在线调查做出回应。采用描述性统计和相关性卡方检验对数据进行分析。在本分析中包含的14种策略中,所有本科课程都采用了教师可用性和对测试和临床表现的及时反馈。有组织的学习小组和同伴指导是使用最少的策略。来自BSN和AD项目的教师报告说,他们使用了许多策略,并认为它们的使用对少数民族护理学生的保留是有效的。评价最高的策略是那些涉及护士、教师和学生直接互动的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信