Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Waiver at the World Trade Organization: A BIT of a Challenge

Prabhash Ranjan
{"title":"Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Waiver at the World Trade Organization: A BIT of a Challenge","authors":"Prabhash Ranjan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3888980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To augment the global production and distribution of Covid-19 medical products such as vaccines, drugs and other therapeutics, countries are negotiating for temporarily waiving certain provisions of the TRIPS agreement at the WTO. Depending on the conditions that would govern the waiver, countries would amend their domestic intellectual property (IP) laws to effectively implement the waiver. While the waiver would provide immunity to IP-related regulatory measures from legal claims at the WTO, multinational pharmaceutical companies can use the investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism under bilateral investment treaties (BITs) to challenge such IP-related regulatory measures. In case of such a challenge to IP-related regulatory measures, will the host State be able to defend these measures? The paper answers this question by dividing the investment treaty practice into those BITs that contain carve-out for IP and those that don’t. The former set of treaties provides greater regulatory autonomy to implement the TRIPS waiver. However, given the fragmented and incoherent nature of the ISDS mechanism, the final outcome would depend on arbitral discretion.","PeriodicalId":122765,"journal":{"name":"LSN: WTO Law (Topic)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: WTO Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3888980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To augment the global production and distribution of Covid-19 medical products such as vaccines, drugs and other therapeutics, countries are negotiating for temporarily waiving certain provisions of the TRIPS agreement at the WTO. Depending on the conditions that would govern the waiver, countries would amend their domestic intellectual property (IP) laws to effectively implement the waiver. While the waiver would provide immunity to IP-related regulatory measures from legal claims at the WTO, multinational pharmaceutical companies can use the investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism under bilateral investment treaties (BITs) to challenge such IP-related regulatory measures. In case of such a challenge to IP-related regulatory measures, will the host State be able to defend these measures? The paper answers this question by dividing the investment treaty practice into those BITs that contain carve-out for IP and those that don’t. The former set of treaties provides greater regulatory autonomy to implement the TRIPS waiver. However, given the fragmented and incoherent nature of the ISDS mechanism, the final outcome would depend on arbitral discretion.
世界贸易组织中与贸易有关的知识产权豁免:一个小小的挑战
为了加强疫苗、药物和其他治疗药物等Covid-19医疗产品的全球生产和分销,各国正在世贸组织就暂时放弃《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》的某些条款进行谈判。根据制约豁免的条件,各国将修改其国内知识产权法,以有效实施豁免。虽然豁免将使与知识产权有关的监管措施免受世贸组织的法律索赔,但跨国制药公司可以利用双边投资条约(BITs)下的投资者-国家争端解决机制(ISDS)来挑战此类与知识产权有关的监管措施。在知识产权相关监管措施面临这种挑战的情况下,东道国是否能够捍卫这些措施?本文通过将投资条约实践分为包含知识产权分割的双边投资条约和不包含知识产权分割的双边投资条约来回答这个问题。前一套条约为实施TRIPS豁免提供了更大的监管自主权。然而,鉴于ISDS机制的碎片化和不连贯的性质,最终结果将取决于仲裁裁量权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信