Unpacking Writing Assessment Tasks for Junior High School Students: A Comprehensive Analysis

Hidayah Nor, Saadillah, Nada Afifi
{"title":"Unpacking Writing Assessment Tasks for Junior High School Students: A Comprehensive Analysis","authors":"Hidayah Nor, Saadillah, Nada Afifi","doi":"10.22515/elereviews.v3i1.6979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research addresses the issue of using course books as the sole source for writing assessment tasks in junior high schools without considering students’ diverse learning needs and capabilities. The study aims to identify and describe the assessment tasks employed by teachers to evaluate the writing skills of junior high school students and investigate students’ perceptions of these tasks. A descriptive qualitative method was used, focusing on MTs Hidayatullah Bahaur in Central Kalimantan as the research setting. Two English teachers and ten students of Class VIII from MTs Hidayatullah Bahaur participated in the study. The data collection techniques included observation, interviews, and documentation. The findings reveal that the English teachers primarily used two categories of assessment tasks: imitative writing, encompassing handwriting, spelling, and punctuation tasks, and intensive writing, which involved grammatical transformation, picture cues, vocabulary assessment, ordering, short-answer, and sentence-completion tasks. Furthermore, interviews with student representatives indicated that the overall quality of the assessment tasks was satisfactory. However, students emphasized the importance of teachers actively explaining the task requirements, as understanding the tasks was crucial for successful completion. Consequently, this study highlights the significance of well-designed assessment tasks accompanied by clear explanations to ensure students’ comprehension and accurate task execution.","PeriodicalId":155981,"journal":{"name":"ELE Reviews: English Language Education Reviews","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELE Reviews: English Language Education Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22515/elereviews.v3i1.6979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research addresses the issue of using course books as the sole source for writing assessment tasks in junior high schools without considering students’ diverse learning needs and capabilities. The study aims to identify and describe the assessment tasks employed by teachers to evaluate the writing skills of junior high school students and investigate students’ perceptions of these tasks. A descriptive qualitative method was used, focusing on MTs Hidayatullah Bahaur in Central Kalimantan as the research setting. Two English teachers and ten students of Class VIII from MTs Hidayatullah Bahaur participated in the study. The data collection techniques included observation, interviews, and documentation. The findings reveal that the English teachers primarily used two categories of assessment tasks: imitative writing, encompassing handwriting, spelling, and punctuation tasks, and intensive writing, which involved grammatical transformation, picture cues, vocabulary assessment, ordering, short-answer, and sentence-completion tasks. Furthermore, interviews with student representatives indicated that the overall quality of the assessment tasks was satisfactory. However, students emphasized the importance of teachers actively explaining the task requirements, as understanding the tasks was crucial for successful completion. Consequently, this study highlights the significance of well-designed assessment tasks accompanied by clear explanations to ensure students’ comprehension and accurate task execution.
对初中生写作评价任务的综合分析
本研究解决了在初中阶段,将教材作为编写评估任务的唯一来源,而不考虑学生多样化的学习需求和能力的问题。本研究旨在识别和描述教师评估初中生写作技能的评估任务,并调查学生对这些任务的看法。以加里曼丹中部的Hidayatullah Bahaur山为研究背景,采用描述性定性方法。来自mt . Hidayatullah Bahaur的两名英语老师和十名八班的学生参与了这项研究。数据收集技术包括观察、访谈和记录。研究结果显示,英语教师主要使用两类评估任务:模仿写作,包括手写、拼写和标点任务;强化写作,包括语法转换、图片提示、词汇评估、排序、简答和句子完成任务。此外,与学生代表的访谈显示,评核任务的整体质素令人满意。然而,学生们强调教师积极解释任务要求的重要性,因为理解任务对于成功完成至关重要。因此,本研究强调了设计良好的评估任务并附有清晰的解释对于确保学生理解和准确执行任务的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信