"It's called life, James": Deconstructing Inclusivity in Skyfall and No Time to Die

Erin Isely
{"title":"\"It's called life, James\": Deconstructing Inclusivity in Skyfall and No Time to Die","authors":"Erin Isely","doi":"10.24877/jbs.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores two of Daniel Craig’s Bond films, Skyfall (2012) and No Time to Die (2021), and the ways in which they seem to offer progressive inclusivity while ultimately reinforcing the exploitative history of the franchise. This study focuses on the changes made to longstanding characters (M, Moneypenny, Felix Leiter, Bond villains, and even the titular 007) in a failed attempt at modernisation and diversity. Despite the changes made to the supporting cast - such as casting Judi Dench as M, casting Black actors as Moneypenny and Felix Leiter, or dropping lines about Q’s sexuality - these two films promote Bond’s way of life as the correct way, a way of life cemented by his death. Both films are tied together by their narrative similarities as well as their mistreatment of minorities, which, though less explicit than in earlier films, is still present in the franchise’s continued desire for white patriarchal dominance. Despite more recent changes to Bond’s allies and villains, which would appear to be a grab for LGBTQ+ inclusion, BIPOC inclusion, and sex/gender equality, the conclusions of both Skyfall and No Time to Die maintain Bond’s white, heteronormative, and masculine control as an agent and representative of the British Empire.","PeriodicalId":173794,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of James Bond Studies","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of James Bond Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24877/jbs.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores two of Daniel Craig’s Bond films, Skyfall (2012) and No Time to Die (2021), and the ways in which they seem to offer progressive inclusivity while ultimately reinforcing the exploitative history of the franchise. This study focuses on the changes made to longstanding characters (M, Moneypenny, Felix Leiter, Bond villains, and even the titular 007) in a failed attempt at modernisation and diversity. Despite the changes made to the supporting cast - such as casting Judi Dench as M, casting Black actors as Moneypenny and Felix Leiter, or dropping lines about Q’s sexuality - these two films promote Bond’s way of life as the correct way, a way of life cemented by his death. Both films are tied together by their narrative similarities as well as their mistreatment of minorities, which, though less explicit than in earlier films, is still present in the franchise’s continued desire for white patriarchal dominance. Despite more recent changes to Bond’s allies and villains, which would appear to be a grab for LGBTQ+ inclusion, BIPOC inclusion, and sex/gender equality, the conclusions of both Skyfall and No Time to Die maintain Bond’s white, heteronormative, and masculine control as an agent and representative of the British Empire.
“这就是生活,詹姆斯”:解构《大破天幕杀机》和《无暇赴死》中的包容性
本文探讨了丹尼尔·克雷格的两部邦德电影,《007:大破天幕杀机》(2012)和《无暇死》(2021),以及它们似乎在提供进步的包容性的同时,最终强化了该系列的剥削历史。这项研究的重点是在现代化和多样化的失败尝试中,对长期存在的角色(M、钱班霓、菲利克斯·莱特、邦德中的反派,甚至是名义上的007)所做的改变。尽管配角阵容有所改变——比如让朱迪·丹奇饰演M,让黑人演员饰演钱班霓和菲利克斯·莱特,或者删除关于Q的性取向的台词——这两部电影都把邦德的生活方式作为正确的方式来推广,一种因他的死而巩固的生活方式。两部电影的叙事相似性以及对少数民族的虐待将它们联系在一起,尽管这一点没有之前的电影那么明显,但仍然存在于对白人父权统治的持续渴望中。尽管最近邦德的盟友和反派发生了变化,似乎是为了争取LGBTQ+的包容、BIPOC的包容和性别平等,但《007:大破天幕杀机》和《无暇赴死》的结论都维持了邦德作为大英帝国代理人和代表的白人、异性恋和男性化控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信