Prelazak prava i obaveza na stečajnog upravnika kao posledica otvaranja stečajnog postupka

Vladimir Kozar, Nemanja Aleksić
{"title":"Prelazak prava i obaveza na stečajnog upravnika kao posledica otvaranja stečajnog postupka","authors":"Vladimir Kozar, Nemanja Aleksić","doi":"10.55836/zbornik_pip_2202a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses provisions of the law, the standpoints of domestic court practice and the opinions of jurisprudence on the transfer of rights and obligations to the bankruptcy manager, as the most important consequence of opening bankruptcy proceedings against the bankruptcy debtor. It was pointed out that the representation and management function are merging in the person of the bankruptcy manager, while the members and shareholders of the bankruptcy debtor retain the ownership function with significant restriction of rights, which results in the suspension of the company’s assembly. The standpoint on the admissibility of the appeal of the majority shareholder against the decision to open bankruptcy proceedings is presented. The effects of bankruptcy on the loss of legal capacity and the transfer of representation rights to the bankruptcy manager, as well as on the limitation of the legal capacity of the bankruptcy debtor are explained. Different views on the legal position of the bankruptcy manager were pointed out. Issues related to the function of interim bankruptcy manager as a sui generis security measure after the revocation of the decision to open bankruptcy proceedings were considered. Also, theoretical and practical issues related to limiting the liability of the bankruptcy manager for damage caused to participants in the proceedings were analyzed, with different views and criticism of existing legal solutions.","PeriodicalId":421992,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik radova sa XXX Susreta pravnika u privredi Republike Srbije","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik radova sa XXX Susreta pravnika u privredi Republike Srbije","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55836/zbornik_pip_2202a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyses provisions of the law, the standpoints of domestic court practice and the opinions of jurisprudence on the transfer of rights and obligations to the bankruptcy manager, as the most important consequence of opening bankruptcy proceedings against the bankruptcy debtor. It was pointed out that the representation and management function are merging in the person of the bankruptcy manager, while the members and shareholders of the bankruptcy debtor retain the ownership function with significant restriction of rights, which results in the suspension of the company’s assembly. The standpoint on the admissibility of the appeal of the majority shareholder against the decision to open bankruptcy proceedings is presented. The effects of bankruptcy on the loss of legal capacity and the transfer of representation rights to the bankruptcy manager, as well as on the limitation of the legal capacity of the bankruptcy debtor are explained. Different views on the legal position of the bankruptcy manager were pointed out. Issues related to the function of interim bankruptcy manager as a sui generis security measure after the revocation of the decision to open bankruptcy proceedings were considered. Also, theoretical and practical issues related to limiting the liability of the bankruptcy manager for damage caused to participants in the proceedings were analyzed, with different views and criticism of existing legal solutions.
破产管理人的权利义务转移作为对破产债务人开启破产程序的最重要后果,本文分析了法律规定、国内法院实践的观点和法学界的观点。有人指出,在破产管理人身上,代表和经营职能正在合并,而破产债务人的成员和股东保留着所有权职能,权利受到重大限制,导致公司大会暂停。提出了大股东对启动破产程序提出上诉的可受理性立场。论述了破产对破产管理人丧失法律行为能力的影响、破产管理人代理权的转移以及破产债务人法律行为能力的限制。对破产管理人的法律地位提出了不同的看法。审议了临时破产管理人在撤销启动破产程序的决定后作为一种特殊保障措施的职能问题。此外,本文还分析了限制破产管理人对诉讼参与人造成损害的责任的理论和实践问题,并对现有的法律解决方案提出了不同的看法和批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信