Comparative analysis of power bipolar devices

G. Busatto, G. Vitale, G. Ferla, A. Galluzzo, M. Melito
{"title":"Comparative analysis of power bipolar devices","authors":"G. Busatto, G. Vitale, G. Ferla, A. Galluzzo, M. Melito","doi":"10.1109/PESC.1990.131183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparison between bipolar Darlington, insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT), bipolar mode field effect transistor (BMFET), and power MOS devices is presented based on an experimental investigation performed on devices with similar geometrical characteristics and blocking voltage capabilities. The main device characteristics (conduction characteristics, switching performances, power dissipation, power ratings, etc.) are presented and compared in order to obtain comprehensive guidelines for finding their fields of application. It is shown that, for higher frequency switching application, MOS devices are the most suitable, but they are very expensive in terms of silicon area used. For frequencies less than 20 kHZ, BMFETs have better performance than IGBTs in terms of power losses. On the other hand, the IGBT is a voltage-controlled device and thus has fewer problems with its driving circuit.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":330807,"journal":{"name":"21st Annual IEEE Conference on Power Electronics Specialists","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"21st Annual IEEE Conference on Power Electronics Specialists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PESC.1990.131183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

A comparison between bipolar Darlington, insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT), bipolar mode field effect transistor (BMFET), and power MOS devices is presented based on an experimental investigation performed on devices with similar geometrical characteristics and blocking voltage capabilities. The main device characteristics (conduction characteristics, switching performances, power dissipation, power ratings, etc.) are presented and compared in order to obtain comprehensive guidelines for finding their fields of application. It is shown that, for higher frequency switching application, MOS devices are the most suitable, but they are very expensive in terms of silicon area used. For frequencies less than 20 kHZ, BMFETs have better performance than IGBTs in terms of power losses. On the other hand, the IGBT is a voltage-controlled device and thus has fewer problems with its driving circuit.<>
功率双极器件的比较分析
通过对具有相似几何特性和阻断电压能力的器件进行实验研究,对双极达灵顿器件、绝缘栅双极晶体管(IGBT)、双极模场效应晶体管(BMFET)和功率MOS器件进行了比较。介绍和比较了器件的主要特性(导通特性、开关性能、功耗、额定功率等),以便获得寻找其应用领域的综合指南。结果表明,对于更高频率的开关应用,MOS器件是最合适的,但就使用的硅面积而言,它们非常昂贵。对于低于20khz的频率,bmfet在功率损耗方面优于igbt。另一方面,IGBT是一种电压控制装置,因此其驱动电路的问题较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信