Correlating intraoperative bile culture with postoperative morbidity in pancreaticoduodenectomy

M. Lattoo, Sadaf Ali
{"title":"Correlating intraoperative bile culture with postoperative morbidity in pancreaticoduodenectomy","authors":"M. Lattoo, Sadaf Ali","doi":"10.4103/ssj.ssj_43_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The reported incidence of bacteria in bile is extremely variable from 8% to 42%. Several authors have been able to correlate the bacteria cultured from bile at pancreatico-duodenectomy (PD) with those subsequently causing wound infections and septicemia in the postoperative period. In addition, preoperative biliary intervention increases the risk of bactibilia that can translate into increased postoperative morbidity. Materials and Methods: This study was a prospective study conducted at the Department of Surgical Gastroenterology in Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences from January 2015 to July 2020. A total of 71 patients who underwent PD were included in the study. Results: All patients had intraoperative bile culture (IBC). IBC was positive in forty (56.3%) patients. IBC was more likely to be positive in patients with preoperative intervention as compared to those with no intervention (86.11% vs. 13.89%). IBC was polymicrobial in 28/40 (70%) patients, with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella Pneumoniae both cultured together in 40% of patients. The monomicrobial infection was mainly due to E. coli in 22.5% of patients. Six/40 (15%) patients with bactibilia had wound infection and 4/40 (10%) patients had intra-abdominal collection. Patients with intervention had more of bactibilia (31/36 [86.11%]) compared to that of noninterventional group (9/35 [25.71%]), showing that the intervention was associated with an increased risk of biliary infection. The percentage of multidrug-resistant strains in our study was 97.7%. Conclusion: Positive IBC can determine the cohort of patients who are at risk of postoperative morbidity. Patients with preoperative intervention should be considered potentially infected who deserve careful operative technique to avoid spillage of bile to minimize wound infection and other morbidity. IBC also allows for early appropriate antibiotic use.","PeriodicalId":420307,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Surgical Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Surgical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ssj.ssj_43_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The reported incidence of bacteria in bile is extremely variable from 8% to 42%. Several authors have been able to correlate the bacteria cultured from bile at pancreatico-duodenectomy (PD) with those subsequently causing wound infections and septicemia in the postoperative period. In addition, preoperative biliary intervention increases the risk of bactibilia that can translate into increased postoperative morbidity. Materials and Methods: This study was a prospective study conducted at the Department of Surgical Gastroenterology in Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences from January 2015 to July 2020. A total of 71 patients who underwent PD were included in the study. Results: All patients had intraoperative bile culture (IBC). IBC was positive in forty (56.3%) patients. IBC was more likely to be positive in patients with preoperative intervention as compared to those with no intervention (86.11% vs. 13.89%). IBC was polymicrobial in 28/40 (70%) patients, with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella Pneumoniae both cultured together in 40% of patients. The monomicrobial infection was mainly due to E. coli in 22.5% of patients. Six/40 (15%) patients with bactibilia had wound infection and 4/40 (10%) patients had intra-abdominal collection. Patients with intervention had more of bactibilia (31/36 [86.11%]) compared to that of noninterventional group (9/35 [25.71%]), showing that the intervention was associated with an increased risk of biliary infection. The percentage of multidrug-resistant strains in our study was 97.7%. Conclusion: Positive IBC can determine the cohort of patients who are at risk of postoperative morbidity. Patients with preoperative intervention should be considered potentially infected who deserve careful operative technique to avoid spillage of bile to minimize wound infection and other morbidity. IBC also allows for early appropriate antibiotic use.
胰十二指肠切除术术中胆汁培养与术后发病率的关系
背景:报道的胆汁中细菌的发生率从8%到42%变化很大。一些作者已经能够将胰十二指肠切除术(PD)中从胆汁中培养的细菌与随后在术后引起伤口感染和败血症的细菌联系起来。此外,术前胆道干预增加了细菌增多的风险,这可能转化为术后发病率的增加。材料与方法:本研究是一项前瞻性研究,于2015年1月至2020年7月在Sher-I-Kashmir医学科学研究所外科消化内科进行。共有71例PD患者被纳入研究。结果:所有患者均行术中胆汁培养(IBC)。40例(56.3%)患者IBC阳性。术前干预的患者IBC阳性率高于未干预的患者(86.11%比13.89%)。在28/40(70%)的患者中,IBC是多微生物的,在40%的患者中,大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌同时培养。单菌感染以大肠杆菌为主,占22.5%。6 /40(15%)的菌群患者有伤口感染,4/40(10%)的患者有腹腔内收集。干预组患者结核菌数(31/36[86.11%])高于未干预组(9/35[25.71%]),表明干预与胆道感染风险增加有关。本研究中耐多药菌株的比例为97.7%。结论:IBC阳性可以确定有术后并发症风险的患者队列。术前干预的患者应考虑潜在的感染,应谨慎的手术技术,以避免胆汁溢出,以减少伤口感染和其他发病率。IBC还允许早期适当使用抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信