The prevalence of latex sensitivity among operating room personnel: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Reza Tavakkol, N. Hatami, Soheil Hassanipour, Mahdi Malakoutikhah
{"title":"The prevalence of latex sensitivity among operating room personnel: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Reza Tavakkol, N. Hatami, Soheil Hassanipour, Mahdi Malakoutikhah","doi":"10.4103/iahs.iahs_119_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Latex sensitivity has been a concern for health-care workers in recent years. Due to the excessive exposure to latex products in the operating room, the personnel of this department are exposed to high sensitivity to these products. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of latex sensitivity among operating room personnel. Materials and Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis conducted based on a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist. The present study researchers explored four international databases, namely Medline/PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, and Embase in February 2020. The selected keywords for international databases were classified into three categories (a) operating room personnel, (b) latex sensitivity, and (c) prevalence. The collected data were entered into the EndNote X8 software and analytical analysis was performed by STATA statistical software version 12. Results: Seventy-five articles were found by searching for databases. After several screening steps, 12 articles entered the final analysis. The results show that the prevalence of latex sensitivity in total is 14.76 (confidence interval 95%: 9.27–20.25). Meta-regression results showed that the relationship between the years of study and the prevalence of latex sensitivity is not statistically significant (P = 0.222). Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that sensitivity to latex is significantly prevalent among operating room staff. Due to the importance of sterility and sensitive working conditions in the operating room, as well as frequent contact with latex products, it is important to pay attention to the side effects caused by latex powder.","PeriodicalId":160562,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Health Sciences","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/iahs.iahs_119_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Latex sensitivity has been a concern for health-care workers in recent years. Due to the excessive exposure to latex products in the operating room, the personnel of this department are exposed to high sensitivity to these products. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of latex sensitivity among operating room personnel. Materials and Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis conducted based on a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist. The present study researchers explored four international databases, namely Medline/PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, and Embase in February 2020. The selected keywords for international databases were classified into three categories (a) operating room personnel, (b) latex sensitivity, and (c) prevalence. The collected data were entered into the EndNote X8 software and analytical analysis was performed by STATA statistical software version 12. Results: Seventy-five articles were found by searching for databases. After several screening steps, 12 articles entered the final analysis. The results show that the prevalence of latex sensitivity in total is 14.76 (confidence interval 95%: 9.27–20.25). Meta-regression results showed that the relationship between the years of study and the prevalence of latex sensitivity is not statistically significant (P = 0.222). Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that sensitivity to latex is significantly prevalent among operating room staff. Due to the importance of sterility and sensitive working conditions in the operating room, as well as frequent contact with latex products, it is important to pay attention to the side effects caused by latex powder.
手术室人员乳胶敏感性的流行:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:乳胶敏感性近年来一直是卫生保健工作者关注的问题。由于在手术室中接触乳胶制品过多,本科室人员对乳胶制品的敏感性较高。因此,本研究旨在调查手术室人员乳胶敏感性的流行情况。材料和方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析基于系统评价和荟萃分析清单的首选报告项目进行。本研究研究人员于2020年2月对Medline/PubMed、ProQuest、Scopus和Embase四个国际数据库进行了探索。选定的国际数据库关键词分为三类(a)手术室人员,(b)乳胶敏感性,(c)患病率。采集数据输入EndNote X8软件,采用STATA统计软件12版进行分析分析。结果:检索到文献75篇。经过几个筛选步骤,12篇文章进入最终分析。结果表明,总乳胶敏感性患病率为14.76(置信区间95%:9.27 ~ 20.25)。meta回归结果显示,研究年限与乳胶敏感性患病率之间的关系无统计学意义(P = 0.222)。结论:本研究结果表明,手术室工作人员对乳胶的敏感性明显普遍。由于手术室无菌和敏感工作条件的重要性,以及与乳胶制品的频繁接触,因此要注意乳胶粉引起的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信