Business Models and Grid Impact of Energy Storages and Controllable Loads for PV-Self-Consumption at Prosumer Level

B. Idlbi, D. Stakic, Matthias Casel, D. Graeber, G. Heilscher, Martin Fiedler
{"title":"Business Models and Grid Impact of Energy Storages and Controllable Loads for PV-Self-Consumption at Prosumer Level","authors":"B. Idlbi, D. Stakic, Matthias Casel, D. Graeber, G. Heilscher, Martin Fiedler","doi":"10.2991/ires-19.2019.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many countries are experiencing rapidly increasing distributed generation (DG) of renewable energy sources (RES). Electricity self-consumption is currently replacing feed-in-tariffs (FIT) as one main driver of this development. A prosumer, who is a consumer and producer of energy through his own DG, like photovoltaic (PV), can save costs through the self-consumption of his PV energy. The attractiveness of this business case is mainly based on the decreasing levelized cost of energy (LCOE) of PV systems as well as the difference between the decreasing FIT and the increasing costs of electricity consumption from the public grid. Utilizing local energy storages like batteries or power-to-heat (PtH) can increase both self-consumption and earnings. Noticing this tendency, electricity suppliers and industrial manufacturers offer new business models, in which small local storages of prosumers can be substituted with district storages or even virtual storages. This contribution presents an economic comparison and grid impact analysis of different self-consumption business models (i.e. home storages, PtH, district storages, virtual storages), considering the perspectives of prosumers as well as electricity suppliers. For realistic results, assumptions have been made based on the data of a real grid area near the city of Ulm. The results show that home storages, district storages as well as PtH systems are currently significantly less profitable for prosumers compared to pure PV-systems, if only selfconsumption is targeted as a business case. District storages are not attractive as a business model as well, whereas cloud storages can yield a quite good return at least for the electricity suppliers. However, an analysis of a future scenario indicates a better economic potential for storage business models. The grid impact analysis demonstrates a possible reduction of load and voltage through storages. Yet, for an efficient use of storage systems in regard to the electricity grid, financial incentives are necessary to support a grid-friendly operation of storages. Keywords—Home Battery Storage, District Battery Storage, Power-to-Heat, Self-Consumption, Business Models, Grid Impact","PeriodicalId":424726,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 13th International Renewable Energy Storage Conference 2019 (IRES 2019)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 13th International Renewable Energy Storage Conference 2019 (IRES 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ires-19.2019.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Many countries are experiencing rapidly increasing distributed generation (DG) of renewable energy sources (RES). Electricity self-consumption is currently replacing feed-in-tariffs (FIT) as one main driver of this development. A prosumer, who is a consumer and producer of energy through his own DG, like photovoltaic (PV), can save costs through the self-consumption of his PV energy. The attractiveness of this business case is mainly based on the decreasing levelized cost of energy (LCOE) of PV systems as well as the difference between the decreasing FIT and the increasing costs of electricity consumption from the public grid. Utilizing local energy storages like batteries or power-to-heat (PtH) can increase both self-consumption and earnings. Noticing this tendency, electricity suppliers and industrial manufacturers offer new business models, in which small local storages of prosumers can be substituted with district storages or even virtual storages. This contribution presents an economic comparison and grid impact analysis of different self-consumption business models (i.e. home storages, PtH, district storages, virtual storages), considering the perspectives of prosumers as well as electricity suppliers. For realistic results, assumptions have been made based on the data of a real grid area near the city of Ulm. The results show that home storages, district storages as well as PtH systems are currently significantly less profitable for prosumers compared to pure PV-systems, if only selfconsumption is targeted as a business case. District storages are not attractive as a business model as well, whereas cloud storages can yield a quite good return at least for the electricity suppliers. However, an analysis of a future scenario indicates a better economic potential for storage business models. The grid impact analysis demonstrates a possible reduction of load and voltage through storages. Yet, for an efficient use of storage systems in regard to the electricity grid, financial incentives are necessary to support a grid-friendly operation of storages. Keywords—Home Battery Storage, District Battery Storage, Power-to-Heat, Self-Consumption, Business Models, Grid Impact
产消级光伏自用储能和可控负荷的商业模式和电网影响
许多国家正在经历可再生能源(RES)分布式发电(DG)的快速增长。电力自用目前正在取代上网电价(FIT),成为这一发展的主要推动力。一个产消者,通过他自己的DG(如光伏),既是能源的消费者又是能源的生产者,他可以通过自己消费他的光伏能源来节省成本。这个商业案例的吸引力主要是基于光伏系统的平均能源成本(LCOE)的下降,以及FIT的下降和公共电网电力消耗成本的增加之间的差异。利用电池或电热(PtH)等本地能源存储可以增加自我消耗和收入。注意到这一趋势,电力供应商和工业制造商提供了新的商业模式,在这种模式中,生产消费者的小型本地存储可以被区域存储甚至虚拟存储所取代。这篇文章从产消者和电力供应商的角度出发,对不同的自用商业模式(即家庭储能、PtH、区域储能、虚拟储能)进行了经济比较和电网影响分析。为了使结果更逼真,我们基于乌尔姆市附近的一个真实网格区域的数据进行了假设。结果表明,如果仅将自我消费作为商业案例,那么家庭存储,区域存储以及PtH系统目前对产消者来说,与纯pv系统相比,利润明显较低。区域存储作为一种商业模式也没有吸引力,而云存储可以产生相当不错的回报,至少对电力供应商来说是这样。然而,对未来情景的分析表明,存储业务模式具有更好的经济潜力。电网影响分析表明,通过存储可以降低负荷和电压。然而,为了有效地利用电网方面的储能系统,财政激励是必要的,以支持电网友好的储能操作。关键词:家用电池储能,区域电池储能,电换热,自用,商业模式,电网影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信