Learner evaluation of an online continuing medical education course for general practitioners

N. D. Silva, Geetha Udayangani Kulasekera
{"title":"Learner evaluation of an online continuing medical education course for general practitioners","authors":"N. D. Silva, Geetha Udayangani Kulasekera","doi":"10.4038/SLJBMI.V3I3.4470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Societal expectations for quality medical care have made it imperative that doctors undergo Continuing Medical Education (CME) to keep abreast of new developments in medicine. Taking cognizance of the potential of ‘Online Learning’, the OUSL offered an online CME course on cardiovascular health for physicians. The course purchased from Monash University, Australia was updated and adapted to suit the Sri Lankan context. The course which was available in print format was converted into an online format on the learning management system ‘Moodle’. While designing the online format, the course was enriched by using audio visual material, discussion forums, self assessment activities and an online reflective journal. Online assessments included a variety of assessment methods. The course team functioned as tutor mentors to facilitate learning. All learners (n=21) participated in the evaluation of the course by completing an online questionnaire. The questionnaire had 16 closed questions and seven open ended questions. Responses to the closed questions were gathered on a four point Likert scale. Frequencies were computed for closed questions and content analysis was carried out for open-ended questions. Learners perceived interactive and collaborative learning as the most liked features. They agreed that the audiovisual material enriched the course and that sessions were well structured, easy to understand and interesting. Some disliked essays and reflective writing while others suggested more interaction and audio-visual material to improve the course. Problems faced by learners were mainly of a technical nature. Finally, learners expressed an overall satisfaction with the course and thought that online learning was a rewarding experience. Learner evaluation showed that pedagogy, social environment and technical underpinning should be properly utilised in optimising learning in an online learning environment. The course had provided an enjoyable, satisfying and useful experience for physicians who lack the opportunity of undergoing face to face CME. Sri Lanka Journal of Bio-Medical Informatics 2012; 3 (3):65-74 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/sljbmi.v3i3.4470","PeriodicalId":129773,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lanka Journal of Bio-medical Informatics","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lanka Journal of Bio-medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/SLJBMI.V3I3.4470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Societal expectations for quality medical care have made it imperative that doctors undergo Continuing Medical Education (CME) to keep abreast of new developments in medicine. Taking cognizance of the potential of ‘Online Learning’, the OUSL offered an online CME course on cardiovascular health for physicians. The course purchased from Monash University, Australia was updated and adapted to suit the Sri Lankan context. The course which was available in print format was converted into an online format on the learning management system ‘Moodle’. While designing the online format, the course was enriched by using audio visual material, discussion forums, self assessment activities and an online reflective journal. Online assessments included a variety of assessment methods. The course team functioned as tutor mentors to facilitate learning. All learners (n=21) participated in the evaluation of the course by completing an online questionnaire. The questionnaire had 16 closed questions and seven open ended questions. Responses to the closed questions were gathered on a four point Likert scale. Frequencies were computed for closed questions and content analysis was carried out for open-ended questions. Learners perceived interactive and collaborative learning as the most liked features. They agreed that the audiovisual material enriched the course and that sessions were well structured, easy to understand and interesting. Some disliked essays and reflective writing while others suggested more interaction and audio-visual material to improve the course. Problems faced by learners were mainly of a technical nature. Finally, learners expressed an overall satisfaction with the course and thought that online learning was a rewarding experience. Learner evaluation showed that pedagogy, social environment and technical underpinning should be properly utilised in optimising learning in an online learning environment. The course had provided an enjoyable, satisfying and useful experience for physicians who lack the opportunity of undergoing face to face CME. Sri Lanka Journal of Bio-Medical Informatics 2012; 3 (3):65-74 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/sljbmi.v3i3.4470
全科医生在线继续医学教育课程的学习者评价
社会对高质量医疗服务的期望使得医生必须接受继续医学教育(CME),以跟上医学的新发展。认识到"在线学习"的潜力,牛津大学医学院为医生提供了关于心血管健康的在线继续教育课程。从澳大利亚莫纳什大学购买的课程经过更新和调整,以适应斯里兰卡的情况。在学习管理系统“Moodle”上,以印刷形式提供的课程被转换为在线格式。在设计在线形式的过程中,通过使用视听材料、论坛、自我评估活动和在线反思日志来丰富课程内容。在线评估包括多种评估方法。课程团队扮演导师导师的角色,促进学习。所有学习者(n=21)通过填写在线问卷参与课程评估。问卷有16个封闭式问题和7个开放式问题。对封闭问题的回答以4分李克特量表收集。对封闭式问题计算频率,对开放式问题进行内容分析。学习者认为互动和协作学习是最受欢迎的特点。他们一致认为,视听材料丰富了课程内容,课程结构合理,易于理解和有趣。一些人不喜欢论文和反思性写作,而另一些人则建议增加互动和视听材料,以改善课程。学习者面临的问题主要是技术性的。最后,学习者对课程表达了总体满意度,并认为在线学习是一种有益的体验。学习者评价表明,在优化在线学习环境中的学习时,应适当利用教学法、社会环境和技术基础。该课程为缺乏面对面继续医学教育机会的医师提供了愉快、满意和有用的经验。斯里兰卡生物医学信息学杂志2012;3 (3):65-74 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/sljbmi.v3i3.4470
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信