Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty: an analysis of statements and policies

Huw Roberts, Josh Cowls, F. Casolari, J. Morley, M. Taddeo, Luciano Floridi
{"title":"Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty: an analysis of statements and policies","authors":"Huw Roberts, Josh Cowls, F. Casolari, J. Morley, M. Taddeo, Luciano Floridi","doi":"10.14763/2021.3.1575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The European Union (EU) has, with increasing frequency, outlined an intention to strengthen its “digital sovereignty” as a basis for safeguarding European values in the digital age. Yet, uncertainty remains as to how the term should be defined, undermining efforts to assess the success of the EU’s digital sovereignty agenda. The task of this paper is to reduce this uncertainty by i) analysing how digital sovereignty has been discussed by EU institutional actors and placing this in a wider conceptual framework, ii) mapping specific policy areas and measures that EU institutional actors cite as important for strengthening digital sovereignty, iii) assessing the effectiveness of current policy measures at strengthening digital sovereignty, and iv) proposing policy solutions that go above and beyond current measures and address existing gaps. To do this, we introduce a conceptual understanding of digital sovereignty and then empirically ground this within the specific EU context via an analysis of a corpus of 180 EU webpages that have mentioned the term “digital sovereignty” within the past year. We find that existing policies, in particular those pertaining to data governance, help to achieve some of the EU’s specific aims in regard to digital sovereignty, such as conditioning outward data flows, but they are more limited concerning other aims, like advancing the EU’s competitiveness and regulating the private sector. This is problematic insofar as it constrains the EU’s ability to safeguard and promote its values. The policy solutions we propose represent steps towards the further strengthening of the EU’s digital sovereignty and firmer protection of EU values. This paper is part of Governing “European values” inside data flows , a special issue of Internet Policy Review guest-edited by Kristina Irion, Mira Burri, Ans Kolk, Stefania Milan.","PeriodicalId":219999,"journal":{"name":"Internet Policy Rev.","volume":"2012 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Policy Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.3.1575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

: The European Union (EU) has, with increasing frequency, outlined an intention to strengthen its “digital sovereignty” as a basis for safeguarding European values in the digital age. Yet, uncertainty remains as to how the term should be defined, undermining efforts to assess the success of the EU’s digital sovereignty agenda. The task of this paper is to reduce this uncertainty by i) analysing how digital sovereignty has been discussed by EU institutional actors and placing this in a wider conceptual framework, ii) mapping specific policy areas and measures that EU institutional actors cite as important for strengthening digital sovereignty, iii) assessing the effectiveness of current policy measures at strengthening digital sovereignty, and iv) proposing policy solutions that go above and beyond current measures and address existing gaps. To do this, we introduce a conceptual understanding of digital sovereignty and then empirically ground this within the specific EU context via an analysis of a corpus of 180 EU webpages that have mentioned the term “digital sovereignty” within the past year. We find that existing policies, in particular those pertaining to data governance, help to achieve some of the EU’s specific aims in regard to digital sovereignty, such as conditioning outward data flows, but they are more limited concerning other aims, like advancing the EU’s competitiveness and regulating the private sector. This is problematic insofar as it constrains the EU’s ability to safeguard and promote its values. The policy solutions we propose represent steps towards the further strengthening of the EU’s digital sovereignty and firmer protection of EU values. This paper is part of Governing “European values” inside data flows , a special issue of Internet Policy Review guest-edited by Kristina Irion, Mira Burri, Ans Kolk, Stefania Milan.
以数字主权捍卫欧洲价值观:声明和政策分析
欧盟(EU)越来越频繁地概述了加强其“数字主权”的意图,以此作为在数字时代维护欧洲价值观的基础。然而,如何定义这个术语仍然存在不确定性,这破坏了评估欧盟数字主权议程成功与否的努力。本文的任务是通过以下方式减少这种不确定性:1)分析欧盟机构参与者如何讨论数字主权,并将其置于更广泛的概念框架中;2)绘制欧盟机构参与者认为对加强数字主权很重要的具体政策领域和措施;3)评估当前政策措施在加强数字主权方面的有效性。第四,提出超越现有措施、解决现有差距的政策解决方案。为此,我们引入了对数字主权的概念性理解,然后通过对过去一年中提到“数字主权”一词的180个欧盟网页的语料库的分析,在特定的欧盟背景下对其进行实证分析。我们发现,现有政策,特别是与数据治理有关的政策,有助于实现欧盟在数字主权方面的一些具体目标,例如限制数据向外流动,但在提高欧盟竞争力和监管私营部门等其他目标方面则更为有限。这是有问题的,因为它限制了欧盟维护和促进其价值观的能力。我们提出的政策解决方案代表了进一步加强欧盟数字主权和更坚定地保护欧盟价值观的步骤。本文是《互联网政策评论》特刊《管理数据流中的“欧洲价值观”》的一部分,由Kristina Irion、Mira Burri、Ans Kolk、Stefania Milan特约编辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信