Nanoparticles and their Current Potential Use to Detect Monocyte Subsets in Vivo

M. R. López
{"title":"Nanoparticles and their Current Potential Use to Detect Monocyte Subsets in Vivo","authors":"M. R. López","doi":"10.31546/BBAB.1002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Monocyte subsets: A growing unresolved complexity Circulating human monocytes are bone marrowderived leukocytes that can differentiate into macrophages and dendritic cells. They participate in the induction and regulation of the inflammatory processes as well as in the adaptive immune responses [1]. The monocyte population is heterogeneous, exhibits high plasticity, and includes cellular subsets with different morphological features and functions. The monocyte subpopulations are conventionally defined according to the relative surface expression of CD14 (co-receptor, along with the toll-like receptor 4/TLR4, of the bacterial lipopolysaccharide/LPS), and CD16 (FcRIIIa). Although three different monocyte subsets were initially defined: classical (CD14++CD16−), intermediate (CD14+CD16+), and non-classical (CD14+ CD16++) [2], the advances in molecular immunology have demonstrated that this cellular lineage is more complex than previously observed as it is described later. Classical monocytes constitute about 80–95% of the circulating monocytes and have prominent phagocytic capabilities [3]. Classical monocytes are important scavenger cells [4] that remove apoptotic bodies in a non-inflammatory fashion. They are rapidly recruited to sites of infection [5] and injury [6-8], where they exhibit considerable functional plasticity [9]. The intermediate subset comprises about 2–8% of the circulating monocytes, increase in inflammatory or infectious conditions, and produce TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10 [10, 11]. These cells participate in the proliferation and stimulation of T-cells, the inflammatory responses, and the angiogenesis. It is proposed that intermediate monocytes make up a transitional population bridging the classical and non-classical ones [12].","PeriodicalId":158996,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioscience, Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioscience, Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31546/BBAB.1002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Monocyte subsets: A growing unresolved complexity Circulating human monocytes are bone marrowderived leukocytes that can differentiate into macrophages and dendritic cells. They participate in the induction and regulation of the inflammatory processes as well as in the adaptive immune responses [1]. The monocyte population is heterogeneous, exhibits high plasticity, and includes cellular subsets with different morphological features and functions. The monocyte subpopulations are conventionally defined according to the relative surface expression of CD14 (co-receptor, along with the toll-like receptor 4/TLR4, of the bacterial lipopolysaccharide/LPS), and CD16 (FcRIIIa). Although three different monocyte subsets were initially defined: classical (CD14++CD16−), intermediate (CD14+CD16+), and non-classical (CD14+ CD16++) [2], the advances in molecular immunology have demonstrated that this cellular lineage is more complex than previously observed as it is described later. Classical monocytes constitute about 80–95% of the circulating monocytes and have prominent phagocytic capabilities [3]. Classical monocytes are important scavenger cells [4] that remove apoptotic bodies in a non-inflammatory fashion. They are rapidly recruited to sites of infection [5] and injury [6-8], where they exhibit considerable functional plasticity [9]. The intermediate subset comprises about 2–8% of the circulating monocytes, increase in inflammatory or infectious conditions, and produce TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10 [10, 11]. These cells participate in the proliferation and stimulation of T-cells, the inflammatory responses, and the angiogenesis. It is proposed that intermediate monocytes make up a transitional population bridging the classical and non-classical ones [12].
纳米颗粒及其在体内检测单核细胞亚群的潜在用途
背景单核细胞亚群:不断增长的未解决的复杂性循环人单核细胞是骨髓来源的白细胞,可以分化为巨噬细胞和树突状细胞。它们参与炎症过程的诱导和调节以及适应性免疫反应[1]。单核细胞群体是异质性的,表现出高度的可塑性,包括具有不同形态特征和功能的细胞亚群。单核细胞亚群通常根据CD14(细菌脂多糖/LPS的共受体,以及toll样受体4/TLR4)和CD16 (FcRIIIa)的相对表面表达来定义。虽然最初定义了三种不同的单核细胞亚群:经典(CD14++CD16−)、中间(CD14+CD16+)和非经典(CD14+CD16+)[2],但分子免疫学的进展表明,这种细胞谱系比之前观察到的更复杂,正如后面所描述的那样。经典单核细胞约占循环单核细胞的80-95%,具有突出的吞噬能力[3]。经典单核细胞是重要的清道夫细胞[4],它以非炎症方式清除凋亡小体。它们被迅速招募到感染部位[5]和损伤部位[6-8],在那里它们表现出相当大的功能可塑性[9]。中间亚群包括约2-8%的循环单核细胞,在炎症或感染性条件下增加,并产生TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6和IL-10[10,11]。这些细胞参与t细胞的增殖和刺激、炎症反应和血管生成。有人提出,中间单核细胞构成了连接经典单核细胞和非经典单核细胞的过渡群体[12]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信