An appraisal of the EU Directive on Trade Secrets

Jens Schovsbo, T. Minssen, T. Riis
{"title":"An appraisal of the EU Directive on Trade Secrets","authors":"Jens Schovsbo, T. Minssen, T. Riis","doi":"10.4337/9781788973342.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The EU Trade Secrets Directive (‘the Directive’)2 has standardized EU member states’ national laws on the protection of trade secrets. For the first time, a harmonized definition of what constitutes a ‘trade secret’ is established, as well as common measures aimed at preventing the misappropriation of trade secrets and rules for procedures and sanctions. The adoption of the Directive reflects the growing importance of trade secrecy protection internationally. Trade secrets offer protection even for knowhow and business information that cannot be protected by conventional intellectual property rights (IPRs). This could, for instance, be an invention that does not fulfil the requirements to obtain patent protection, such as the eligibility, novelty or nonobviousness criteria or nontechnical business information such as price or customer information. Another advantage of trade secrets is that the protection can in principle last in perpetuity, while conventional types of IPRs offer protection only for a limited period of time. Since it is not the information as such which is being protected, the trade secret holder cannot, however, object to the fact that a third party independently develops identical products, processes, algorithms and so on. Protection lapses as soon as the information protected as a trade secret becomes publicly available or loses its commercial value. As is well known from IPRs, protecting information comes with strings attached. National experiences have shown that protecting trade secrets may give rise to special concerns about defining the protectable subject matter and the scope of the protection. One example includes the many instances where secrets are being developed or used as part of an employment contract. Here an overly","PeriodicalId":162088,"journal":{"name":"The Harmonization and Protection of Trade Secrets in the EU","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Harmonization and Protection of Trade Secrets in the EU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788973342.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The EU Trade Secrets Directive (‘the Directive’)2 has standardized EU member states’ national laws on the protection of trade secrets. For the first time, a harmonized definition of what constitutes a ‘trade secret’ is established, as well as common measures aimed at preventing the misappropriation of trade secrets and rules for procedures and sanctions. The adoption of the Directive reflects the growing importance of trade secrecy protection internationally. Trade secrets offer protection even for knowhow and business information that cannot be protected by conventional intellectual property rights (IPRs). This could, for instance, be an invention that does not fulfil the requirements to obtain patent protection, such as the eligibility, novelty or nonobviousness criteria or nontechnical business information such as price or customer information. Another advantage of trade secrets is that the protection can in principle last in perpetuity, while conventional types of IPRs offer protection only for a limited period of time. Since it is not the information as such which is being protected, the trade secret holder cannot, however, object to the fact that a third party independently develops identical products, processes, algorithms and so on. Protection lapses as soon as the information protected as a trade secret becomes publicly available or loses its commercial value. As is well known from IPRs, protecting information comes with strings attached. National experiences have shown that protecting trade secrets may give rise to special concerns about defining the protectable subject matter and the scope of the protection. One example includes the many instances where secrets are being developed or used as part of an employment contract. Here an overly
《欧盟商业秘密指令》评析
《欧盟商业秘密指令》(以下简称《指令》)规范了欧盟成员国保护商业秘密的国家法律。《公约》第一次确立了“商业秘密”的统一定义,以及旨在防止商业秘密被盗用的共同措施,以及有关程序和制裁的规则。该指令的通过反映了国际上保护商业秘密的重要性日益增加。商业秘密甚至为传统知识产权(ipr)无法保护的专有技术和商业信息提供保护。例如,这可能是一项不符合获得专利保护要求的发明,如合格性、新颖性或非显而易见性标准,或非技术业务信息,如价格或客户信息。商业秘密的另一个优点是,原则上可以永久保护,而传统类型的知识产权只能在有限的时间内提供保护。然而,由于受保护的不是信息本身,商业秘密持有人不能反对第三方独立开发相同的产品、工艺、算法等事实。一旦受商业秘密保护的信息公开或失去其商业价值,保护即告失效。众所周知,保护信息是有附加条件的。国家经验表明,保护商业秘密可能会引起对确定可保护主题和保护范围的特别关注。一个例子包括许多正在开发秘密或将秘密用作雇佣合同的一部分的情况。这里有一个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信