CULTURAL DIVERSITY AT WORK: CONCEPTS, PERCEIVED CONSEQUENCES AND PERSONAL RESOURCES FOR FRENCH AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYEES

Alexandrine Ceschiutti, René Mokounkolo
{"title":"CULTURAL DIVERSITY AT WORK: CONCEPTS, PERCEIVED CONSEQUENCES AND PERSONAL RESOURCES FOR FRENCH AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYEES","authors":"Alexandrine Ceschiutti, René Mokounkolo","doi":"10.36315/2022inpact044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Background: As a result of globalization, work environments are now characterized by cultural diversity, resulting in diversified norms and approaches to quality of life at work (QWL), for which employees and organizations are unprepared (Ellemers & Rink, 2016). Consideration of this diversity is imperative because it can lead to intercultural misunderstandings and conflicts that are likely to affect employees’ performance and level of QWL (Stahl et al., 2010). Thus, to adapt, employees and organizations need to develop intercultural skills (Nguyen et al., 2018). Objectives: This study aims at three exploratory objectives. First, we observed employees’ perceptions of cultural differences, the indicators that they see as most salient, and how they evaluate them. Second, the perceived consequences of cultural diversity at work. Finally, the personal resources that can enable employees to interact effectively in culturally diverse situations. Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 French agricultural employees (10 women and 2 men, aged between 18 and 65). An interview guide was used, and the data were analysed to identify the frequency of occurrence of each theme in text segments (Braun & Clarke, 2006). Results: The results show that the participants were aware of cross-cultural differences, which they perceived through 10 principal indicators. They observed that cultural diversity at work could have both positive (e.g. cohesion) and negative (e.g. racism) personal and organizational consequences and that cultural differences affect QWL and performance. Finally, with regard to the resources required to manage cultural diversity at work. The participants observed the importance of acquiring personal resources, in line with the literature on intercultural skills like cultural intelligence (Early & Ang, 2003).\"","PeriodicalId":120251,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Applications and Trends","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Applications and Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022inpact044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Background: As a result of globalization, work environments are now characterized by cultural diversity, resulting in diversified norms and approaches to quality of life at work (QWL), for which employees and organizations are unprepared (Ellemers & Rink, 2016). Consideration of this diversity is imperative because it can lead to intercultural misunderstandings and conflicts that are likely to affect employees’ performance and level of QWL (Stahl et al., 2010). Thus, to adapt, employees and organizations need to develop intercultural skills (Nguyen et al., 2018). Objectives: This study aims at three exploratory objectives. First, we observed employees’ perceptions of cultural differences, the indicators that they see as most salient, and how they evaluate them. Second, the perceived consequences of cultural diversity at work. Finally, the personal resources that can enable employees to interact effectively in culturally diverse situations. Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 French agricultural employees (10 women and 2 men, aged between 18 and 65). An interview guide was used, and the data were analysed to identify the frequency of occurrence of each theme in text segments (Braun & Clarke, 2006). Results: The results show that the participants were aware of cross-cultural differences, which they perceived through 10 principal indicators. They observed that cultural diversity at work could have both positive (e.g. cohesion) and negative (e.g. racism) personal and organizational consequences and that cultural differences affect QWL and performance. Finally, with regard to the resources required to manage cultural diversity at work. The participants observed the importance of acquiring personal resources, in line with the literature on intercultural skills like cultural intelligence (Early & Ang, 2003)."
工作中的文化多样性:法国农业雇员的概念、感知后果和个人资源
背景:由于全球化,工作环境现在以文化多样性为特征,导致工作生活质量(QWL)的规范和方法多样化,员工和组织对此毫无准备(Ellemers & Rink, 2016)。考虑这种多样性是必要的,因为它可能导致跨文化误解和冲突,这可能会影响员工的绩效和QWL水平(Stahl et al., 2010)。因此,为了适应,员工和组织需要发展跨文化技能(Nguyen et al., 2018)。目的:本研究旨在三个探索性目标。首先,我们观察了员工对文化差异的看法,他们认为最突出的指标,以及他们如何评估这些指标。第二,工作中文化多样性的感知后果。最后,个人资源,可以使员工在不同文化的情况下有效地互动。方法:对12名法国农业从业人员进行半结构化访谈,其中女性10名,男性2名,年龄在18 ~ 65岁之间。使用访谈指南,并对数据进行分析,以确定文本段中每个主题的出现频率(Braun & Clarke, 2006)。结果:研究结果表明,被试意识到跨文化差异,他们通过10个主要指标感知到跨文化差异。他们观察到,工作中的文化多样性可能对个人和组织产生积极(例如凝聚力)和消极(例如种族主义)的影响,文化差异会影响QWL和绩效。最后,关于管理工作中的文化多样性所需的资源。参与者观察到获取个人资源的重要性,这与文化智力等跨文化技能的文献一致(Early & Ang, 2003)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信