(Deep) Media Art and Meme Shaping: the Artistic Involvement in Science and Technology and the Foundation of Alternative Narratives

Magrini Boris
{"title":"(Deep) Media Art and Meme Shaping: the Artistic Involvement in Science and Technology and the Foundation of Alternative Narratives","authors":"Magrini Boris","doi":"10.15593/perm.kipf/2019.4.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The turbulent relationship between art, science, and technology has a long and fertile histo- ry. While the separation of these disciplines in modern times continues to increase, many at-tempts to bridge them again are flourishing in recent times [1]. Digital technologies – from Artifi- cial Intelligence to Bioinformatics – are deeply embedded in our life and the efforts to involve a larger community in the discussion of their meaning and consequences are necessary. The capitalist imperatives prevail on a global scale, allowing leading companies that have achieved the monopoly of international services – Google, Facebook, Alibaba, Uber, etc. – to produce immense benefits through automation. The products of these companies are affecting our life in a subtle way and we have developed a symbiotic relationship with algorithms: we change our behaviours and adapt our lifestyle to accommodate the applications that we use while these provide massive amount of personal data to instruct and improve their algorithms. This bond is not a novelty. We are defined by the technology that we have developed through the centuries, from the primitive, agricultural tools to the products of the industrial and later digital revolution. While often viewed as the counterpart of nature, technology is by many considered the exten-sion of nature, a credo that is widespread among progressive thinkers, as well. In the light of the growing embedding of digital technologies in our everyday life, the artistic engagement with technology and scientific research is a necessary one. On the one hand, it is a beneficial step in the dissemination and understanding of science outside the privileged field of practitioners, a point often emphasised by promoters of art and science endeavours. On the other – the hypothesis that I am proposing – it allows to develop alternative lectures regarding the narratives that are given us by the scientific community and by the corporations producing and administering these technologies. In this article I am mainly considering the works that engage with the recent developments of computation and digital technologies, and their application in entertainment, bio-technologies and economics. I am interested in the attitude and the contribution of artists toward the techno-scientific discourse, rather than at- tempting to define a specific field of artistic production related to a specific media.","PeriodicalId":216595,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of PNRPU. Culture. History. Philosophy. Law.","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of PNRPU. Culture. History. Philosophy. Law.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15593/perm.kipf/2019.4.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The turbulent relationship between art, science, and technology has a long and fertile histo- ry. While the separation of these disciplines in modern times continues to increase, many at-tempts to bridge them again are flourishing in recent times [1]. Digital technologies – from Artifi- cial Intelligence to Bioinformatics – are deeply embedded in our life and the efforts to involve a larger community in the discussion of their meaning and consequences are necessary. The capitalist imperatives prevail on a global scale, allowing leading companies that have achieved the monopoly of international services – Google, Facebook, Alibaba, Uber, etc. – to produce immense benefits through automation. The products of these companies are affecting our life in a subtle way and we have developed a symbiotic relationship with algorithms: we change our behaviours and adapt our lifestyle to accommodate the applications that we use while these provide massive amount of personal data to instruct and improve their algorithms. This bond is not a novelty. We are defined by the technology that we have developed through the centuries, from the primitive, agricultural tools to the products of the industrial and later digital revolution. While often viewed as the counterpart of nature, technology is by many considered the exten-sion of nature, a credo that is widespread among progressive thinkers, as well. In the light of the growing embedding of digital technologies in our everyday life, the artistic engagement with technology and scientific research is a necessary one. On the one hand, it is a beneficial step in the dissemination and understanding of science outside the privileged field of practitioners, a point often emphasised by promoters of art and science endeavours. On the other – the hypothesis that I am proposing – it allows to develop alternative lectures regarding the narratives that are given us by the scientific community and by the corporations producing and administering these technologies. In this article I am mainly considering the works that engage with the recent developments of computation and digital technologies, and their application in entertainment, bio-technologies and economics. I am interested in the attitude and the contribution of artists toward the techno-scientific discourse, rather than at- tempting to define a specific field of artistic production related to a specific media.
(深)媒体艺术与模因塑造:科学技术的艺术介入与另类叙事的基础
艺术、科学和技术之间的动荡关系有着悠久而丰富的历史,尽管现代这些学科的分离在继续增加,但近年来,许多试图将它们重新连接起来的尝试正在蓬勃发展。数字技术——从人工智能到生物信息学——已深深融入我们的生活,让更大的群体参与讨论其意义和后果的努力是必要的。资本主义的必要性在全球范围内占上风,这使得那些已经垄断了国际服务的领先公司——百度、Facebook、阿里巴巴、优步等——能够通过自动化产生巨大的利益。这些公司的产品正以一种微妙的方式影响着我们的生活,我们已经与算法建立了一种共生关系:我们改变我们的行为和调整我们的生活方式来适应我们使用的应用程序,而这些应用程序提供了大量的个人数据来指导和改进它们的算法。这种债券并不新鲜。几个世纪以来,从原始的农业工具到工业和后来的数字革命的产品,我们发展的技术定义了我们。虽然技术经常被视为自然的对应物,但许多人认为技术是自然的延伸,这一信条在进步思想家中也很普遍。随着数字技术越来越多地融入我们的日常生活,艺术与技术和科学研究的结合是必要的。一方面,这是在从业者特权领域之外传播和理解科学的有益步骤,这一点经常被艺术和科学事业的推动者所强调。另一方面,也就是我提出的假设,它允许我们对科学团体和生产和管理这些技术的公司给我们的叙述进行替代讲座。在这篇文章中,我主要考虑的是与计算和数字技术的最新发展有关的作品,以及它们在娱乐、生物技术和经济中的应用。我感兴趣的是艺术家对科技话语的态度和贡献,而不是试图定义与特定媒体相关的艺术生产的特定领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信