A comparative study on CRP and ESR in the diagnosis of pediatric septicemia: An institutional experience

Dr. N Ram Charana Reddy
{"title":"A comparative study on CRP and ESR in the diagnosis of pediatric septicemia: An institutional experience","authors":"Dr. N Ram Charana Reddy","doi":"10.33545/26643685.2020.v3.i1c.202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that occurs when the body's response to an infection damages its own tissues and organs. In children, sepsis is a leading cause of death. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) in pediatric patients with suspected septicemia. Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 125 pediatric patients aged 0-12 years, comprising a sepsis group (n=75) and a control group (n=50). Demographic data, presenting symptoms, vital signs on presentation, and laboratory results, including CRP and ESR levels, were recorded and analyzed. Results: Mean CRP levels were significantly higher in the sepsis group than in the control group. Similarly, mean ESR was higher in the sepsis group. Both parameters correlated with the severity of symptoms and aberrant vital signs on presentation. Conclusion: Both CRP and ESR showed significant elevation in pediatric septicemia, with CRP appearing more accurate and reliable. Further large-scale, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and establish standardized cut-off levels for these biomarkers in diagnosing pediatric sepsis.","PeriodicalId":144032,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Paediatrics and Geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Paediatrics and Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26643685.2020.v3.i1c.202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that occurs when the body's response to an infection damages its own tissues and organs. In children, sepsis is a leading cause of death. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) in pediatric patients with suspected septicemia. Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 125 pediatric patients aged 0-12 years, comprising a sepsis group (n=75) and a control group (n=50). Demographic data, presenting symptoms, vital signs on presentation, and laboratory results, including CRP and ESR levels, were recorded and analyzed. Results: Mean CRP levels were significantly higher in the sepsis group than in the control group. Similarly, mean ESR was higher in the sepsis group. Both parameters correlated with the severity of symptoms and aberrant vital signs on presentation. Conclusion: Both CRP and ESR showed significant elevation in pediatric septicemia, with CRP appearing more accurate and reliable. Further large-scale, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and establish standardized cut-off levels for these biomarkers in diagnosing pediatric sepsis.
CRP与ESR在小儿败血症诊断中的比较研究:一项机构经验
败血症是一种危及生命的疾病,当身体对感染的反应损害了自身的组织和器官时,就会发生败血症。在儿童中,败血症是导致死亡的主要原因。本研究旨在比较c反应蛋白(CRP)和红细胞沉降率(ESR)对小儿疑似败血症的诊断效果。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入125例0-12岁的儿童患者,包括败血症组(n=75)和对照组(n=50)。记录和分析人口统计数据、出现症状、就诊时的生命体征和实验室结果,包括CRP和ESR水平。结果:脓毒症组CRP水平明显高于对照组。同样,脓毒症组的平均ESR更高。这两个参数与症状的严重程度和出现时的异常生命体征相关。结论:小儿败血症CRP和ESR均有显著升高,CRP更准确可靠。需要进一步的大规模前瞻性研究来验证这些发现,并建立诊断儿童败血症时这些生物标志物的标准化截止水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信