Quarantined! Examining the Effects of a Community-Wide Moderation Intervention on Reddit

Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Shagun Jhaver, A. Bruckman, Eric Gilbert
{"title":"Quarantined! Examining the Effects of a Community-Wide Moderation Intervention on Reddit","authors":"Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Shagun Jhaver, A. Bruckman, Eric Gilbert","doi":"10.1145/3490499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Should social media platforms override a community’s self-policing when it repeatedly break rules? What actions can they consider? In light of this debate, platforms have begun experimenting with softer alternatives to outright bans. We examine one such intervention called quarantining, that impedes direct access to and promotion of controversial communities. Specifically, we present two case studies of what happened when Reddit quarantined the influential communities r/TheRedPill (TRP) and r/The_Donald (TD). Using over 85M Reddit posts, we apply causal inference methods to examine the quarantine’s effects on TRP and TD. We find that the quarantine made it more difficult to recruit new members: new user influx to TRP and TD decreased by 79.5% and 58%, respectively. Despite quarantining, existing users’ misogyny and racism levels remained unaffected. We conclude by reflecting on the effectiveness of this design friction in limiting the influence of toxic communities and discuss broader implications for content moderation.","PeriodicalId":322583,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3490499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

Should social media platforms override a community’s self-policing when it repeatedly break rules? What actions can they consider? In light of this debate, platforms have begun experimenting with softer alternatives to outright bans. We examine one such intervention called quarantining, that impedes direct access to and promotion of controversial communities. Specifically, we present two case studies of what happened when Reddit quarantined the influential communities r/TheRedPill (TRP) and r/The_Donald (TD). Using over 85M Reddit posts, we apply causal inference methods to examine the quarantine’s effects on TRP and TD. We find that the quarantine made it more difficult to recruit new members: new user influx to TRP and TD decreased by 79.5% and 58%, respectively. Despite quarantining, existing users’ misogyny and racism levels remained unaffected. We conclude by reflecting on the effectiveness of this design friction in limiting the influence of toxic communities and discuss broader implications for content moderation.
隔离!检查Reddit社区范围内适度干预的效果
当一个社区一再违反规则时,社交媒体平台是否应该凌驾于其自我监管之上?他们可以考虑采取什么行动?鉴于这场争论,各大平台已经开始尝试采用更温和的替代方案,而不是完全禁止。我们研究了一种称为隔离的干预措施,它阻碍了直接进入和促进有争议的社区。具体来说,我们提出了Reddit隔离有影响力的社区r/TheRedPill (TRP)和r/The_Donald (TD)时发生的两个案例研究。使用超过8500万个Reddit帖子,我们应用因果推理方法来检查隔离对TRP和TD的影响。我们发现隔离使得招募新成员变得更加困难:TRP和TD的新用户流入分别下降了79.5%和58%。尽管进行了隔离,但现有用户的厌女症和种族主义水平并未受到影响。最后,我们反思了这种设计摩擦在限制有毒社区影响方面的有效性,并讨论了内容审核的更广泛含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信