Mediation Regulation Re-Arrangement’s Efforts At The State Court Based On Confidential Principles As The Parties’ Protection

Rika Destiny Sinaga, Joni Emirzon, M. Syaifuddin
{"title":"Mediation Regulation Re-Arrangement’s Efforts At The State Court Based On Confidential Principles As The Parties’ Protection","authors":"Rika Destiny Sinaga, Joni Emirzon, M. Syaifuddin","doi":"10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no2.2332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mediation has a confidentiality principle as an advantage that should be able to safeguard the reputation of the disputing parties. Still, mediation arrangements in district courts are influenced by the principle of open trial to the public, causing problems, which are; how is the confidentiality principle-based mediation arrangement in district courts in providing protection for the reputation of the party in the dispute and how efforts to reform mediation arrangements in court to realize the confidentiality principle in settlement of civil cases in district courts which is oriented towards legal protection of the reputation of the litigant by using normative legal research that uses primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials collected by document study and then analyzed using descriptive, comparative, evaluative and argumentative techniques. The conclusion is that the mediation procedure in court is regulated by the Supreme Court Regulation Number 02 of 2003 then replaced by the Supreme Court Regulation Number 01 of 2008. Finally, the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 has regulated the principle of confidentiality but has not fully regulated the principle of confidentiality so that efforts are needed. Regulations on mediation experience law unification and reformation of the civil procedural law. The House of Representatives and the government form a special law to regulate mediation to become the legal basis for laws and regulations that use mediation.","PeriodicalId":149215,"journal":{"name":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no2.2332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mediation has a confidentiality principle as an advantage that should be able to safeguard the reputation of the disputing parties. Still, mediation arrangements in district courts are influenced by the principle of open trial to the public, causing problems, which are; how is the confidentiality principle-based mediation arrangement in district courts in providing protection for the reputation of the party in the dispute and how efforts to reform mediation arrangements in court to realize the confidentiality principle in settlement of civil cases in district courts which is oriented towards legal protection of the reputation of the litigant by using normative legal research that uses primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials collected by document study and then analyzed using descriptive, comparative, evaluative and argumentative techniques. The conclusion is that the mediation procedure in court is regulated by the Supreme Court Regulation Number 02 of 2003 then replaced by the Supreme Court Regulation Number 01 of 2008. Finally, the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 has regulated the principle of confidentiality but has not fully regulated the principle of confidentiality so that efforts are needed. Regulations on mediation experience law unification and reformation of the civil procedural law. The House of Representatives and the government form a special law to regulate mediation to become the legal basis for laws and regulations that use mediation.
以当事人保密原则为保障的国家法院调解规则重整之努力
调解具有保密原则这一优势,应该能够维护争议当事人的声誉。然而,区域法院的调解安排受公开审讯原则的影响,造成问题,包括:以保密原则为基础的地方法院调解安排是如何为争议当事人的名誉提供保护的?如何通过规范的法律研究,运用初级的、以法律保护当事人名誉为导向的地方法院调解安排改革,实现对当事人名誉的保密原则在地方法院民事案件解决中的应用?通过文献研究收集的二级和三级法律材料,然后使用描述、比较、评估和论证技术进行分析。结论是,法院调解程序由2003年第02号最高法院条例规定,然后由2008年第01号最高法院条例取代。最后,2016年《最高法院第1号条例》对保密原则进行了规定,但对保密原则的规定还不够全面,需要努力。调解经验法规定的统一与民事诉讼法的改革。众议院和政府形成专门的法律规范调解,成为运用调解的法律法规的法律依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信