The Quest for an Appropriate Past: The Creation of National Identities in Early Modern Literature, Scholarship, Architecture, and Art

K. Enenkel, K. Ottenheym
{"title":"The Quest for an Appropriate Past: The Creation of National Identities in Early Modern Literature, Scholarship, Architecture, and Art","authors":"K. Enenkel, K. Ottenheym","doi":"10.1163/9789004378216_002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When thinking about the creation of “national literature” and “national styles” in art and architecture, most people will associate these developments with the nineteenth century: this period was characterized by the emergence of national states and attempts to codify specific geographically and nationally defined identities in art, architecture, and literature, based on models from a glorious past.1 However, in the period from 1400 to 1700, as a result of a complex amalgam of political, intellectual, and religious developments, humanist scholars, artists, noblemen, and political leaders all over Europe were engaged in a similar effort.2 The numerous developments and changes in politics and religion represented a challenge. And this challenge called for a response in terms of new efforts of legitimization and authorization. Central in these attempts was the search for suitable and impressive roots in a distant past, which one may call “antiquity”. In late medieval and early modern Europe, “antiquity” was all the more important because political authority was formally based on lineage. In early modern times, all over Europe ruling princes, their courtiers, the civic elite, etc., were preoccupied with their line of descent – and as a result, so too were the humanist scholars, architects, and artists in their circles. Claims of heroic ancestry, lineage, and history for the dynasty became crucial points","PeriodicalId":104280,"journal":{"name":"The Quest for an Appropriate Past in Literature, Art and Architecture","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Quest for an Appropriate Past in Literature, Art and Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004378216_002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When thinking about the creation of “national literature” and “national styles” in art and architecture, most people will associate these developments with the nineteenth century: this period was characterized by the emergence of national states and attempts to codify specific geographically and nationally defined identities in art, architecture, and literature, based on models from a glorious past.1 However, in the period from 1400 to 1700, as a result of a complex amalgam of political, intellectual, and religious developments, humanist scholars, artists, noblemen, and political leaders all over Europe were engaged in a similar effort.2 The numerous developments and changes in politics and religion represented a challenge. And this challenge called for a response in terms of new efforts of legitimization and authorization. Central in these attempts was the search for suitable and impressive roots in a distant past, which one may call “antiquity”. In late medieval and early modern Europe, “antiquity” was all the more important because political authority was formally based on lineage. In early modern times, all over Europe ruling princes, their courtiers, the civic elite, etc., were preoccupied with their line of descent – and as a result, so too were the humanist scholars, architects, and artists in their circles. Claims of heroic ancestry, lineage, and history for the dynasty became crucial points
寻找合适的过去:早期现代文学、学术、建筑和艺术中民族身份的创造
当思考艺术和建筑中“民族文学”和“民族风格”的创造时,大多数人会将这些发展与19世纪联系起来:这一时期的特点是民族国家的出现,以及基于辉煌过去的模式,试图在艺术、建筑和文学中编纂特定的地理和民族定义的身份然而,在1400年至1700年期间,由于政治、知识和宗教发展的复杂混合,整个欧洲的人文主义学者、艺术家、贵族和政治领袖都从事了类似的努力政治和宗教的众多发展和变化构成了挑战。这一挑战需要在合法化和授权方面做出新的努力。这些尝试的核心是在遥远的过去寻找合适的和令人印象深刻的根源,人们可以称之为“古代”。在中世纪晚期和近代早期的欧洲,“古代”更为重要,因为政治权威在形式上是以世系为基础的。在近代早期,整个欧洲的统治王子,他们的朝臣,公民精英等等,都专注于他们的血统-因此,人文主义学者,建筑师和艺术家在他们的圈子里也是如此。对这个王朝来说,英雄祖先、血统和历史的主张成为了关键点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信