Caesar Bardas and the Earthquake of Constantinople: The Rival Depictions of the Event in the Arabic and Byzantine Sources

H. Taghavi, E. Roohi
{"title":"Caesar Bardas and the Earthquake of Constantinople: The Rival Depictions of the Event in the Arabic and Byzantine Sources","authors":"H. Taghavi, E. Roohi","doi":"10.1080/09503110.2021.1998943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The narratives of the reign of the last Amorian emperor, Michael III (r. 842–867), and the government of his uncle, Caesar Bardas (r. 856–866), were mostly authored by hostile Macedonian chroniclers living a century or so following the events they describe. This fact poses considerable difficulties for the historiographical assessment of this period. Recently brought to scholarly attention, a Shīʿī Arabic account has been presented in previous scholarship as a counter-narrative to Byzantine historians’ portrayal of the period of interest. The present study sets out to, first, re-appraise, in the light of fresh historical testimonies, the extent of Byzantine records’ affinities with this “ignored Arabic account” and second, to gauge whether this Arabic evidence can be an aid in filling the historiographical lacuna created by the Byzantine chroniclers’ and hagiographers’ one-sided depiction of the late Amorian period. The latter aim will be pursued via analysis of the rival representations of a traumatic event which happened during Bardas’s rule, namely the earthquake of Constantinople.","PeriodicalId":112464,"journal":{"name":"Al-Masāq","volume":"06 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Masāq","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09503110.2021.1998943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The narratives of the reign of the last Amorian emperor, Michael III (r. 842–867), and the government of his uncle, Caesar Bardas (r. 856–866), were mostly authored by hostile Macedonian chroniclers living a century or so following the events they describe. This fact poses considerable difficulties for the historiographical assessment of this period. Recently brought to scholarly attention, a Shīʿī Arabic account has been presented in previous scholarship as a counter-narrative to Byzantine historians’ portrayal of the period of interest. The present study sets out to, first, re-appraise, in the light of fresh historical testimonies, the extent of Byzantine records’ affinities with this “ignored Arabic account” and second, to gauge whether this Arabic evidence can be an aid in filling the historiographical lacuna created by the Byzantine chroniclers’ and hagiographers’ one-sided depiction of the late Amorian period. The latter aim will be pursued via analysis of the rival representations of a traumatic event which happened during Bardas’s rule, namely the earthquake of Constantinople.
凯撒巴尔达斯和君士坦丁堡地震:阿拉伯语和拜占庭文献中对地震的对立描述
关于最后一位阿莫里亚皇帝米迦勒三世(公元842-867年)的统治和他的叔叔凯撒巴尔达斯(公元856-866年)的政府的叙述,大多是由生活在他们所描述的事件之后一个世纪左右的敌对马其顿编年史家撰写的。这一事实给这一时期的史学评估带来了相当大的困难。最近引起了学术界的注意,在以前的学术中,一种阿拉伯语的叙述被提出,作为拜占庭历史学家对这一时期的描述的反叙述。本研究的目的是,首先,根据新的历史证据,重新评估拜占庭记录与这种“被忽视的阿拉伯叙述”的密切程度,其次,衡量这种阿拉伯证据是否可以帮助填补拜占庭编年史编纂者和圣徒传记编纂者对晚期阿莫里亚时期的片面描述所造成的史学空白。后一个目标将通过分析巴尔达斯统治期间发生的创伤事件,即君士坦丁堡地震的对立表现来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信