Nonlinear Dynamics of Gas-Liquid Separation in a Capillary Microseparator

Anand N. P. Radhakrishnan, M. Pradas, S. Kalliadasis, A. Gavriilidis
{"title":"Nonlinear Dynamics of Gas-Liquid Separation in a Capillary Microseparator","authors":"Anand N. P. Radhakrishnan, M. Pradas, S. Kalliadasis, A. Gavriilidis","doi":"10.1115/ICNMM2018-7613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Micro-engineered devices (MED) are seeing a significant growth in performing separation processes1. Such devices have been implemented in a range of applications from chemical catalytic reactors to product purification systems like microdistillation. One of the biggest advantages of these devices is the dominance of capillarity and interfacial tension forces. A field where MEDs have been used is in gas-liquid separations. These are encountered, for example, after a chemical reactor, where a gaseous component being produced needs immediate removal from the reactor, because it can affect subsequent reactions. The gaseous phase can be effectively removed using an MED with an array of microcapillaries. Phase-separation can then be brought about in a controlled manner along these capillary structures. For a device made from a hydrophilic material (e.g. Si or glass), the wetted phase (e.g. water) flows through the capillaries, while the non-wetted dispersed phase (e.g. gas) is prevented from entering the capillaries, due to capillary pressure. Separation of liquid-liquid flows can also be achieved via this approach. However, the underlying mechanism of phase separation is far from being fully understood. The pressure at which the gas phase enters the capillaries (gas-to-liquid breakthrough) can be estimated from the Young-Laplace equation, governed by the surface tension (γ) of the wetted phase, capillary width (d) and height (h), and the interface equilibrium contact angle (θeq). Similarly, the liquid-to-gas breakthrough pressure (i.e. the point at which complete liquid separation ceases and liquid exits through the gas outlet) can be estimated from the pressure drop across the capillaries via the Hagen-Poiseuille (HP) equation. Several groups reported deviations from these estimates and therefore, included various parameters to account for the deviations. These parameters usually account for (i) flow of wetted phase through ‘n’ capillaries in parallel, (ii) modification of geometric correction factor of Mortensen et al., 2005 2 and (iii) liquid slug length (LS) and number of capillaries (n) during separation. LS has either been measured upstream of the capillary zone or estimated from a scaling law proposed by Garstecki et al., 2006 3. However, this approach does not address the balance between the superficial inlet velocity and net outflow of liquid through each capillary (qc). Another shortcoming of these models has been the estimation of the apparent contact angle (θapp), which plays a critical role in predicting liquid-to-gas breakthrough. θapp is either assumed to be equal to θeq or measured with various techniques, e.g. through capillary rise or a static droplet on a flat substrate, which is significantly different from actual dynamic contact angles during separation. In other cases, the Cox-Voinov model has been used to calculate θapp from θeq and capillary number. Hence, the empirical models available in the literature do not predict realistic breakthrough pressures with sufficient accuracy. Therefore, a more detailed in situ investigation of the critical liquid slug properties during separation is necessary. Here we report advancements in the fundamental understanding of two-phase separation in a gas-liquid separation (GLS) device through a theoretical model developed based on critical events occurring at the gas-liquid interfaces during separation.","PeriodicalId":137208,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2018 16th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME 2018 16th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ICNMM2018-7613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Micro-engineered devices (MED) are seeing a significant growth in performing separation processes1. Such devices have been implemented in a range of applications from chemical catalytic reactors to product purification systems like microdistillation. One of the biggest advantages of these devices is the dominance of capillarity and interfacial tension forces. A field where MEDs have been used is in gas-liquid separations. These are encountered, for example, after a chemical reactor, where a gaseous component being produced needs immediate removal from the reactor, because it can affect subsequent reactions. The gaseous phase can be effectively removed using an MED with an array of microcapillaries. Phase-separation can then be brought about in a controlled manner along these capillary structures. For a device made from a hydrophilic material (e.g. Si or glass), the wetted phase (e.g. water) flows through the capillaries, while the non-wetted dispersed phase (e.g. gas) is prevented from entering the capillaries, due to capillary pressure. Separation of liquid-liquid flows can also be achieved via this approach. However, the underlying mechanism of phase separation is far from being fully understood. The pressure at which the gas phase enters the capillaries (gas-to-liquid breakthrough) can be estimated from the Young-Laplace equation, governed by the surface tension (γ) of the wetted phase, capillary width (d) and height (h), and the interface equilibrium contact angle (θeq). Similarly, the liquid-to-gas breakthrough pressure (i.e. the point at which complete liquid separation ceases and liquid exits through the gas outlet) can be estimated from the pressure drop across the capillaries via the Hagen-Poiseuille (HP) equation. Several groups reported deviations from these estimates and therefore, included various parameters to account for the deviations. These parameters usually account for (i) flow of wetted phase through ‘n’ capillaries in parallel, (ii) modification of geometric correction factor of Mortensen et al., 2005 2 and (iii) liquid slug length (LS) and number of capillaries (n) during separation. LS has either been measured upstream of the capillary zone or estimated from a scaling law proposed by Garstecki et al., 2006 3. However, this approach does not address the balance between the superficial inlet velocity and net outflow of liquid through each capillary (qc). Another shortcoming of these models has been the estimation of the apparent contact angle (θapp), which plays a critical role in predicting liquid-to-gas breakthrough. θapp is either assumed to be equal to θeq or measured with various techniques, e.g. through capillary rise or a static droplet on a flat substrate, which is significantly different from actual dynamic contact angles during separation. In other cases, the Cox-Voinov model has been used to calculate θapp from θeq and capillary number. Hence, the empirical models available in the literature do not predict realistic breakthrough pressures with sufficient accuracy. Therefore, a more detailed in situ investigation of the critical liquid slug properties during separation is necessary. Here we report advancements in the fundamental understanding of two-phase separation in a gas-liquid separation (GLS) device through a theoretical model developed based on critical events occurring at the gas-liquid interfaces during separation.
毛细管微分离器气液分离的非线性动力学
微工程设备(MED)在执行分离过程中正在显着增长。这种装置已经在从化学催化反应器到产品净化系统(如微蒸馏)的一系列应用中实现。这些装置的最大优点之一是毛细管力和界面张力的优势。med的应用领域是气液分离。例如,在化学反应器之后会遇到这些情况,其中产生的气体组分需要立即从反应器中移除,因为它会影响后续反应。气相可以有效地去除使用MED与微毛细管阵列。然后可以沿着这些毛细管结构以可控的方式进行相分离。对于由亲水材料(例如Si或玻璃)制成的装置,由于毛细管压力,湿相(例如水)流过毛细血管,而非湿的分散相(例如气体)被阻止进入毛细血管。液-液流动的分离也可以通过这种方法实现。然而,相分离的潜在机制还远未完全了解。气相进入毛细管时的压力(气液突破)可以由Young-Laplace方程估计,该方程由湿相的表面张力(γ)、毛细管宽度(d)和高度(h)以及界面平衡接触角(θeq)决定。同样,通过hagan - poiseuille (HP)方程,可以从毛细管上的压降估计液气突破压力(即液体完全分离停止并液体通过气体出口排出的点)。几个小组报告了与这些估计的偏差,因此,包括各种参数来解释偏差。这些参数通常考虑(i)湿相平行流过“n”根毛细管,(ii) Mortensen等人,2005年几何校正因子的修正2,以及(iii)分离过程中液段塞长度(LS)和毛细管数量(n)。LS要么是在毛细管区上游测量的,要么是根据Garstecki等人2006年提出的标度定律估算的。然而,这种方法不能解决通过每个毛细管的表面入口速度和净流出液体之间的平衡(qc)。这些模型的另一个缺点是对表观接触角(θapp)的估计,而表观接触角在预测液气突破中起着关键作用。θapp要么假设等于θeq,要么用各种技术测量,例如通过毛细管上升或平面基板上的静态液滴,这与分离过程中实际的动态接触角有很大不同。在其他情况下,采用Cox-Voinov模型从θeq和毛细数计算θapp。因此,文献中可用的经验模型不能以足够的精度预测现实的突破压力。因此,有必要对分离过程中液体段塞的关键特性进行更详细的现场研究。在这里,我们通过基于分离过程中气液界面发生的关键事件开发的理论模型,报告了对气液分离(GLS)装置中两相分离的基本理解的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信