Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Rate of Penetration Prediction

Asad Safarov, Vusal Iskandarov, D. Solomonov
{"title":"Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Rate of Penetration Prediction","authors":"Asad Safarov, Vusal Iskandarov, D. Solomonov","doi":"10.2118/212088-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper, several supervised machine learning algorithms have been used to develop the model for rate of penetration prediction. To train the models, real-time drilling parameters and geological log data from 3 distinct wells in the South Caspian basin are used. The different machine learning techniques, such as linear and non-linear machine learning and deep artificial neural networks, trained the well data. The evaluation metric for training is Root Mean Square Error, however the performances of the regressions are evaluated on the data using R-squared for their comparison.\n Rate of penetration, or simply ROP, is the speed of the drill bit penetrating into the formation. Overall, it indicates at which rate the borehole deepens. Its value depends on the drilling parameters, such as weight on bit, applied torque, mud flow rate, rotation per minute and others. In addition, the mechanical strength of the rock formation also plays a great role, and well log data is used to assume this value for each point. That is why these features in the training datasets have high vulnerability.\n Comparing various techniques, Random Forest gives us the most optimal model in terms of accuracy and computational power. The average R-squared for Random Forest is 0.90. Although RNN and LSTM models can give nearly the same fit for given test data, it takes considerably much more time to train the models due to their complexity and show relatively lower accuracy on test data, therefore it is not a reasonable choice. Furthermore, another deep learning model is deployed to generate well logs for the following sections which supports optimizing ROP and drilling performance.","PeriodicalId":131012,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, November 16, 2022","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, November 16, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212088-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, several supervised machine learning algorithms have been used to develop the model for rate of penetration prediction. To train the models, real-time drilling parameters and geological log data from 3 distinct wells in the South Caspian basin are used. The different machine learning techniques, such as linear and non-linear machine learning and deep artificial neural networks, trained the well data. The evaluation metric for training is Root Mean Square Error, however the performances of the regressions are evaluated on the data using R-squared for their comparison. Rate of penetration, or simply ROP, is the speed of the drill bit penetrating into the formation. Overall, it indicates at which rate the borehole deepens. Its value depends on the drilling parameters, such as weight on bit, applied torque, mud flow rate, rotation per minute and others. In addition, the mechanical strength of the rock formation also plays a great role, and well log data is used to assume this value for each point. That is why these features in the training datasets have high vulnerability. Comparing various techniques, Random Forest gives us the most optimal model in terms of accuracy and computational power. The average R-squared for Random Forest is 0.90. Although RNN and LSTM models can give nearly the same fit for given test data, it takes considerably much more time to train the models due to their complexity and show relatively lower accuracy on test data, therefore it is not a reasonable choice. Furthermore, another deep learning model is deployed to generate well logs for the following sections which supports optimizing ROP and drilling performance.
机器学习技术在渗透率预测中的应用
在本文中,几种有监督的机器学习算法被用于开发渗透率预测模型。为了训练模型,使用了南里海盆地3口不同井的实时钻井参数和地质测井数据。不同的机器学习技术,如线性和非线性机器学习以及深度人工神经网络,可以训练井数据。训练的评估指标是均方根误差,但是回归的性能是用r平方来比较的。钻速,简称ROP,是指钻头钻进地层的速度。总的来说,它表明了井眼加深的速度。其值取决于钻井参数,如钻头重量、施加扭矩、泥浆流速、每分钟旋转数等。此外,岩层的机械强度也起着很大的作用,利用测井资料对每个点进行该值的假设。这就是为什么训练数据集中的这些特征具有很高的脆弱性。比较各种技术,随机森林在准确性和计算能力方面为我们提供了最优模型。随机森林的平均r平方是0.90。尽管RNN和LSTM模型对给定的测试数据可以给出几乎相同的拟合,但由于它们的复杂性,训练模型需要花费相当多的时间,并且在测试数据上显示出相对较低的准确性,因此它不是一个合理的选择。此外,还部署了另一种深度学习模型来生成以下部分的测井曲线,以支持优化ROP和钻井性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信