The Fight for Legitimacy: Liberal Democracy Versus Terrorism

Cindy R. Jebb
{"title":"The Fight for Legitimacy: Liberal Democracy Versus Terrorism","authors":"Cindy R. Jebb","doi":"10.21236/ada390205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract : This study uses an interdisciplinary approach to address the challenge of transnational threats, namely terrorism, to liberal democracies. Terrorism poses unique challenges to the liberal democratic state, and the transnational nature of terrorism necessitates cooperation between and among states. However, terrorism must be analyzed in a political and strategic context. The forces of globalization and fragmentation and the increasing claims of irredentism and secession, require a reexamination of state legitimacy. The best way for states to win legitimacy vis a vis terrorists is by adhering to liberal democratic values and cooperating with other such states. Such cooperation, which affects domestic and foreign policies, requires a convergence of political cultures among those cooperating states. This study analyzes three cases: the Basques in Spain, the ethnic Albanians in Macedonia, and the Kurds in Turkey. This study sheds light on how academics and policymakers ought to characterize and categorize terrorism, and it provides insights on the concepts of political legitimacy, liberal democracy, political culture, and political community. As the US assesses its homeland defense posture, it must resist any temptation to weaken its liberal democratic values, and as a superpower, it must encourage other states to adhere to liberal democratic values as well. Liberal democracy is not just a normative concern, it is a security imperative in today\"s transnational security environment.","PeriodicalId":183784,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Conflict Studies","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Conflict Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21236/ada390205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract : This study uses an interdisciplinary approach to address the challenge of transnational threats, namely terrorism, to liberal democracies. Terrorism poses unique challenges to the liberal democratic state, and the transnational nature of terrorism necessitates cooperation between and among states. However, terrorism must be analyzed in a political and strategic context. The forces of globalization and fragmentation and the increasing claims of irredentism and secession, require a reexamination of state legitimacy. The best way for states to win legitimacy vis a vis terrorists is by adhering to liberal democratic values and cooperating with other such states. Such cooperation, which affects domestic and foreign policies, requires a convergence of political cultures among those cooperating states. This study analyzes three cases: the Basques in Spain, the ethnic Albanians in Macedonia, and the Kurds in Turkey. This study sheds light on how academics and policymakers ought to characterize and categorize terrorism, and it provides insights on the concepts of political legitimacy, liberal democracy, political culture, and political community. As the US assesses its homeland defense posture, it must resist any temptation to weaken its liberal democratic values, and as a superpower, it must encourage other states to adhere to liberal democratic values as well. Liberal democracy is not just a normative concern, it is a security imperative in today"s transnational security environment.
为合法性而战:自由民主与恐怖主义
摘要:本研究采用跨学科的方法来解决跨国威胁,即恐怖主义对自由民主国家的挑战。恐怖主义对自由民主国家提出了独特的挑战,恐怖主义的跨国性质需要国家之间和国家之间的合作。然而,必须在政治和战略背景下分析恐怖主义。全球化和分裂的力量,以及民族统一主义和分裂的呼声日益高涨,要求我们重新审视国家的合法性。各国在面对恐怖分子时赢得合法性的最佳方式是坚持自由民主价值观,并与其他这样的国家合作。这种合作影响到国内和外交政策,要求这些合作国家之间的政治文化趋同。本研究分析了三个案例:西班牙的巴斯克人、马其顿的阿尔巴尼亚人和土耳其的库尔德人。这项研究阐明了学者和政策制定者应该如何对恐怖主义进行定性和分类,并提供了对政治合法性、自由民主、政治文化和政治社区等概念的见解。在美国评估其国土防御态势时,它必须抵制任何削弱其自由民主价值观的诱惑,而且作为一个超级大国,它必须鼓励其他国家也坚持自由民主价值观。自由民主不仅是一种规范问题,而且是当今跨国安全环境中必不可少的安全问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信