The politics of palaeontology: the creation, reduction, and restoration of Grand Staircase–Escalante and Bears Ears national monuments

Geological Curator Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.55468/gc1460
P. D. Polly
{"title":"The politics of palaeontology: the creation, reduction, and restoration of Grand Staircase–Escalante and Bears Ears national monuments","authors":"P. D. Polly","doi":"10.55468/gc1460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grand Staircase–Escalante and Bears Ears are tracts of U.S. federal lands in Utah that were designated as national monuments in 1996 and 2016 respectively in part for the importance of their geological and palaeontological resources. In the 25 years since it was established, Grand Staircase–Escalante became known as the “science monument” for its strong emphasis on palaeontological science, including coordinating activities of its palaeontological manager. Synthesis of the hundreds of research papers there transformed scientific understanding of Mesozoic ecosystems. Before a management plan could be implemented at Bears Ears National Monument, President Donald Trump reduced the boundaries of both monuments to less than half their originally designated area. His action was arguably the first major rollback of palaeontological resources in the United States, underscoring the position of palaeontological science in the political debate about federal lands. Palaeontologists joined Native American tribes, conservation groups, and businesses in a joint effort to re-establish the monuments, an effort that was partially realised when President Joseph Biden restored their boundaries in 2021 but was not immediately able to reinstate previous management priorities. The palaeontological significance of these national monuments intersects with many other perspectives on the value and use of these lands, including indigenous and religious groups who faced oppression, the conservation of wilderness, economic and industrial development, and political struggle between state and federal, and executive and legislative aspects of government. This article explores the scientific significance and political context of the palaeontology of these two monuments as an example of how scientific priorities intersect with other societal pressures in the management of public lands.","PeriodicalId":203203,"journal":{"name":"Geological Curator","volume":"2016 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Curator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55468/gc1460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grand Staircase–Escalante and Bears Ears are tracts of U.S. federal lands in Utah that were designated as national monuments in 1996 and 2016 respectively in part for the importance of their geological and palaeontological resources. In the 25 years since it was established, Grand Staircase–Escalante became known as the “science monument” for its strong emphasis on palaeontological science, including coordinating activities of its palaeontological manager. Synthesis of the hundreds of research papers there transformed scientific understanding of Mesozoic ecosystems. Before a management plan could be implemented at Bears Ears National Monument, President Donald Trump reduced the boundaries of both monuments to less than half their originally designated area. His action was arguably the first major rollback of palaeontological resources in the United States, underscoring the position of palaeontological science in the political debate about federal lands. Palaeontologists joined Native American tribes, conservation groups, and businesses in a joint effort to re-establish the monuments, an effort that was partially realised when President Joseph Biden restored their boundaries in 2021 but was not immediately able to reinstate previous management priorities. The palaeontological significance of these national monuments intersects with many other perspectives on the value and use of these lands, including indigenous and religious groups who faced oppression, the conservation of wilderness, economic and industrial development, and political struggle between state and federal, and executive and legislative aspects of government. This article explores the scientific significance and political context of the palaeontology of these two monuments as an example of how scientific priorities intersect with other societal pressures in the management of public lands.
古生物学的政治:大阶梯-埃斯卡兰特和熊耳国家纪念碑的创建、减少和恢复
大阶梯-埃斯卡兰特和熊耳是犹他州的美国联邦土地,分别于1996年和2016年被指定为国家纪念碑,部分原因是其地质和古生物资源的重要性。在成立的25年里,大阶梯-埃斯卡兰特因其对古生物科学的重视,包括古生物学经理的协调活动,而被称为“科学纪念碑”。综合数百篇研究论文,改变了对中生代生态系统的科学认识。在熊耳国家纪念碑的管理计划实施之前,唐纳德·特朗普总统将两个纪念碑的边界缩小到不到原来指定区域的一半。他的行动可以说是美国古生物学资源的第一次重大倒退,强调了古生物学科学在关于联邦土地的政治辩论中的地位。古生物学家与美洲原住民部落、保护组织和企业共同努力重建这些纪念碑,当约瑟夫·拜登总统于2021年恢复其边界时,这一努力部分实现了,但未能立即恢复以前的管理重点。这些国家纪念碑的古生物学意义与这些土地的价值和利用的许多其他观点相交叉,包括面临压迫的土著和宗教团体,荒野保护,经济和工业发展,州和联邦之间的政治斗争,以及政府的行政和立法方面。本文探讨了这两个纪念碑的古生物学的科学意义和政治背景,作为科学优先事项如何与公共土地管理中的其他社会压力相交的一个例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信