Confronting the Ambiguities of Safe Space in Creative and Participatory Work

E. Vacchelli
{"title":"Confronting the Ambiguities of Safe Space in Creative and Participatory Work","authors":"E. Vacchelli","doi":"10.1108/978-1-83982-250-620211016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter is based on qualitative data collected in the course of a research project characterized by the use of a range of participatory methods with the purpose of providing a creative space for migrant, refugee and asylum-seeking women discussing familial practices. The ambiguities of the term ‘safe space’ are explored in light of the fact space cannot be entirely safe as is imbued with power relations including racialized and gendered hierarchies, among others. The fieldwork for the project discussed here revealed potential uncertainties and pitfalls in the creation of a space which is safe enough to share personal experiences in the context of a research project.","PeriodicalId":112157,"journal":{"name":"Re-conceptualizing Safe Spaces","volume":"152 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Re-conceptualizing Safe Spaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-250-620211016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter is based on qualitative data collected in the course of a research project characterized by the use of a range of participatory methods with the purpose of providing a creative space for migrant, refugee and asylum-seeking women discussing familial practices. The ambiguities of the term ‘safe space’ are explored in light of the fact space cannot be entirely safe as is imbued with power relations including racialized and gendered hierarchies, among others. The fieldwork for the project discussed here revealed potential uncertainties and pitfalls in the creation of a space which is safe enough to share personal experiences in the context of a research project.
面对创造性和参与性工作中安全空间的模糊性
本章是根据在一个研究项目过程中收集的定性数据编写的,该研究项目的特点是采用了一系列参与性方法,目的是为移民、难民和寻求庇护的妇女提供讨论家庭习俗的创造性空间。“安全空间”一词的模糊性是根据这样一个事实来探讨的,即空间不可能完全安全,因为它充满了权力关系,包括种族化和性别等级等。这里讨论的项目实地考察揭示了在创建一个足够安全的空间来分享研究项目背景下的个人经验时潜在的不确定性和陷阱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信