Conclusion

J. Beavers, Andrew J Koontz-Garboden
{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"J. Beavers, Andrew J Koontz-Garboden","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198855781.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 5 summarizes and synthesizes the results of the overall study. The deeper motivation for why roots would not be subject to constraints such as those required by Bifurcation and Manner/Result Complementarity is explored, whereby the semantic specificity of idiosyncratic root meanings may in some cases require also entailing more basic templatic notions and other types of idiosyncratic meanings. This chapter also considers alternative conditions on roots and why these may not hold. It concludes with an outline of the larger typology of roots this study predicts, and in conjunction with a theory of templates how this typology still makes predictions about possible and impossible verbs despite the fact that root meanings can be as complex and unconstrained as the case studies explored here suggest.","PeriodicalId":345297,"journal":{"name":"The Roots of Verbal Meaning","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Roots of Verbal Meaning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198855781.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 5 summarizes and synthesizes the results of the overall study. The deeper motivation for why roots would not be subject to constraints such as those required by Bifurcation and Manner/Result Complementarity is explored, whereby the semantic specificity of idiosyncratic root meanings may in some cases require also entailing more basic templatic notions and other types of idiosyncratic meanings. This chapter also considers alternative conditions on roots and why these may not hold. It concludes with an outline of the larger typology of roots this study predicts, and in conjunction with a theory of templates how this typology still makes predictions about possible and impossible verbs despite the fact that root meanings can be as complex and unconstrained as the case studies explored here suggest.
结论
第五章对全文的研究结果进行了总结和综合。探究了为什么词根不受分叉和方式/结果互补性所要求的约束的更深层次的动机,即在某些情况下,特殊词根意义的语义特异性可能还需要包含更基本的模板概念和其他类型的特殊意义。本章还考虑了根的其他条件,以及为什么这些条件可能不成立。最后概述了本研究预测的更大的词根类型学,并结合模板理论,该类型学如何预测可能和不可能的动词,尽管词根的含义可能像这里探索的案例研究所表明的那样复杂和不受约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信