Reconstructing the Joint Probability Distribution From Basket Prices: A Mildly Ill-Posed Problem

Shuren Tan
{"title":"Reconstructing the Joint Probability Distribution From Basket Prices: A Mildly Ill-Posed Problem","authors":"Shuren Tan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2766054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this thesis, we study basket options which are contracts on N assets. It is known that the risk neutral joint probability density of the assets is uniquely defined by the prices of basket options with positive weights. However, the proof of this fact requires a step involving the inversion of a Laplace transform. It is known that inversion of a Laplace transform is a severely ill-posed problem. The purpose of this thesis is to understand whether inversion of the basket transform is ill-posed or not.In our dissertation, we propose three methods to determine and prove the order of ill-posedness for the case when the basket contains only one asset and then map the problem to Radon transform to address two or higher dimensional case. Our proofs show that that problem is mildly ill-posed of order 1/2 (N -1) 2 given N dimensions.We also conduct numerical experiments under the Black-Scholes setting. First, using the reconstruction method from Cohen and Pagliacci, our results show that this method functions well in one-dimension but it becomes numerically intensive in our two-dimensional implementation, and we were unable to achieve convergence. Alternatively, we have looked at using an inverse Radon transform method to reconstruct the joint density numerically. As this requires knowledge of basket prices with negative weights, we have tried extending the basket price in this region as an odd function. For comparison, we compared this against the reconstruction from approximate basket prices calculated directly in the negative weight region. It is fascinating that these two approaches give similar results. This may indicate that the errors are due to the two-moment matching approximation rather than the odd extension. This intriguing possibility would certainly merit further investigation if more time were available.We believe that our mathematical particularly, but also our numerical results indicate there is cause for optimism that a stable numerical algorithm to reconstruct the joint density function from basket prices will be found in the future.","PeriodicalId":346559,"journal":{"name":"Innovation Measurement & Indicators eJournal","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation Measurement & Indicators eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2766054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this thesis, we study basket options which are contracts on N assets. It is known that the risk neutral joint probability density of the assets is uniquely defined by the prices of basket options with positive weights. However, the proof of this fact requires a step involving the inversion of a Laplace transform. It is known that inversion of a Laplace transform is a severely ill-posed problem. The purpose of this thesis is to understand whether inversion of the basket transform is ill-posed or not.In our dissertation, we propose three methods to determine and prove the order of ill-posedness for the case when the basket contains only one asset and then map the problem to Radon transform to address two or higher dimensional case. Our proofs show that that problem is mildly ill-posed of order 1/2 (N -1) 2 given N dimensions.We also conduct numerical experiments under the Black-Scholes setting. First, using the reconstruction method from Cohen and Pagliacci, our results show that this method functions well in one-dimension but it becomes numerically intensive in our two-dimensional implementation, and we were unable to achieve convergence. Alternatively, we have looked at using an inverse Radon transform method to reconstruct the joint density numerically. As this requires knowledge of basket prices with negative weights, we have tried extending the basket price in this region as an odd function. For comparison, we compared this against the reconstruction from approximate basket prices calculated directly in the negative weight region. It is fascinating that these two approaches give similar results. This may indicate that the errors are due to the two-moment matching approximation rather than the odd extension. This intriguing possibility would certainly merit further investigation if more time were available.We believe that our mathematical particularly, but also our numerical results indicate there is cause for optimism that a stable numerical algorithm to reconstruct the joint density function from basket prices will be found in the future.
从篮子价格重构联合概率分布:一个轻度不适定问题
在本文中,我们研究了N种资产合约的篮子期权。已知资产的风险中性联合概率密度是由正权重的一篮子期权价格唯一定义的。然而,这个事实的证明需要一个涉及拉普拉斯变换逆的步骤。众所周知,拉普拉斯变换的反演是一个严重不适定的问题。本文的目的是了解篮变换的反演是否是病态的。在本文中,我们提出了三种方法来确定和证明当篮子中只有一个资产时的不适定性顺序,然后将问题映射到Radon变换来解决二维或高维情况。我们的证明表明,在N维条件下,这个问题是1/2 (N -1) 2阶的轻度病态。我们还在Black-Scholes设置下进行了数值实验。首先,使用Cohen和Pagliacci的重建方法,我们的结果表明,该方法在一维中运行良好,但在二维实现中它变得数字密集,并且我们无法实现收敛。另外,我们还研究了使用反Radon变换方法在数值上重建关节密度。由于这需要了解负权重的篮子价格,我们尝试将该区域的篮子价格扩展为奇函数。为了进行比较,我们将其与直接在负权重区域计算的近似篮子价格的重建进行了比较。令人着迷的是,这两种方法给出了相似的结果。这可能表明误差是由于两矩匹配近似而不是奇数扩展引起的。如果有更多的时间,这种有趣的可能性肯定值得进一步调查。我们相信,我们的数学结果,特别是我们的数值结果表明,有理由乐观地认为,一个稳定的数值算法重建联合密度函数从篮子价格将在未来被发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信