{"title":"Hijra Representations in Bollywood: Adoption and Legal Discourses","authors":"Rukhsar Hussain","doi":"10.1353/ado.2021.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The paper examines the theme of adoption and motherhood in hijra representations in mainstream Indian cinema. Hijras are members of a nonbinary community in regions of South Asia who are born as males but identify mostly as females or third gender. The community is one of the most visible sexual minorities in the subcontinent and can be easily located on the streets across the country, begging, mostly, at traffic signals. They continue to live on the fringes of the mainstream society because they have no other occupation than prostitution and begging. They have also long suffered from misrepresentation in the mainstream culture which obstructs their social integration.The paper argues that adoption and motherhood, which are central to hijra identities, and also to the formation of hijra kinship ties, are almost always presented as \"unnatural\" and criminal in the Indian mainstream commercial films, demonizing the community. In an in-depth analysis of two Indian films, Darmiyaan and Tamanna, I argue that they offer sustained representations of hijra kinship ties, focusing on key themes of adoption and nonbiological parenting, and challenge the conventional idea of \"motherhood.\" Following in the footsteps of scholars such as David Eng, Kim Park Nelson, and Peggy Phelan, this paper critically studies hijra initiation practice with an intersectional lens in order to expose the structural inequalities of race, class, and religion in hijra filmic representations. Thus, this paper starts a conversation in the area of queer, non-cis, community-based \"adoption\" from the Indian subcontinent.","PeriodicalId":140707,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & Culture","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.2021.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
abstract:The paper examines the theme of adoption and motherhood in hijra representations in mainstream Indian cinema. Hijras are members of a nonbinary community in regions of South Asia who are born as males but identify mostly as females or third gender. The community is one of the most visible sexual minorities in the subcontinent and can be easily located on the streets across the country, begging, mostly, at traffic signals. They continue to live on the fringes of the mainstream society because they have no other occupation than prostitution and begging. They have also long suffered from misrepresentation in the mainstream culture which obstructs their social integration.The paper argues that adoption and motherhood, which are central to hijra identities, and also to the formation of hijra kinship ties, are almost always presented as "unnatural" and criminal in the Indian mainstream commercial films, demonizing the community. In an in-depth analysis of two Indian films, Darmiyaan and Tamanna, I argue that they offer sustained representations of hijra kinship ties, focusing on key themes of adoption and nonbiological parenting, and challenge the conventional idea of "motherhood." Following in the footsteps of scholars such as David Eng, Kim Park Nelson, and Peggy Phelan, this paper critically studies hijra initiation practice with an intersectional lens in order to expose the structural inequalities of race, class, and religion in hijra filmic representations. Thus, this paper starts a conversation in the area of queer, non-cis, community-based "adoption" from the Indian subcontinent.
本文考察了印度主流电影中海吉拉表现中的收养和母性主题。海吉拉是南亚地区一个非二元性别群体的成员,他们出生时是男性,但大多认同为女性或第三性别。这个群体是印度次大陆上最显眼的性少数群体之一,可以很容易地在全国各地的街道上找到他们,主要是在交通信号灯处乞讨。她们继续生活在主流社会的边缘,因为她们除了卖淫和乞讨没有其他职业。他们也长期遭受主流文化的歪曲,阻碍了他们的社会融入。本文认为,收养和母性是海吉拉身份的核心,也是海吉拉亲属关系形成的核心,在印度主流商业电影中几乎总是被呈现为“不自然”和犯罪,妖魔化了这个社区。在对两部印度电影《达米亚安》(Darmiyaan)和《塔玛娜》(Tamanna)的深入分析中,我认为它们持续呈现了海吉拉(hijra)的亲属关系,重点关注收养和非亲生养育的关键主题,并挑战了“母性”的传统观念。本文跟随David Eng、Kim Park Nelson和Peggy Phelan等学者的脚步,以交叉视角批判性地研究海吉拉启蒙实践,以揭示海吉拉电影表现中种族、阶级和宗教的结构性不平等。因此,本文开始讨论来自印度次大陆的酷儿、非顺性、社区“收养”问题。