The EMA’s and National Competent Authorities' perspective

César Hernández García
{"title":"The EMA’s and National Competent Authorities' perspective","authors":"César Hernández García","doi":"10.14293/s2199-rexpo22010.v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The perspective for repurposing is quite different when one considers finding a new use for i) an active substance that has never been authorized, ii) a medicine that is still within intellectual property or regulatory data protection or iii) a well-known medicine that is out of any protection period. While pharmaceutical companies may find a commercial interest in pursuing a non-clinical and clinical development in the first two cases, they are less likely to carry out such development for out-of-protection medicines. In the third case, the current environment (regulatory and market access) does not encourage pharmaceutical companies to further explore existing opportunities in repurposing. Other parties, including academic institutions and learned societies, are more willing in general to explore repurposing options when medicines are out of these protection periods. However, this academic research rarely has an impact in terms of regulatory recognition of a new use and indication. Academic sponsors usually do not intend to become marketing authorisation holders, and may have a vague notion about regulatory requirements. In support, the EU Commission has initiated a regulatory science curriculum project called STARS. In addition, the current regulatory pathways do not foresee submission of data by parties that are not intending to be a marketing authorisation holder. This can mean that medicines are used outside their authorised uses (off-label) and official clinical guidelines might recommend their use based on available evidence, despite not being formally authorized. Under the umbrella of the Pharmaceutical Committee and as a result of the discussions at the European Commission Expert Group on Safe and Timely Access to Medicines for Patients (STAMP) a virtual Repurposing Observatory Group (RepOG) was set up in 2019 to define and test the practical aspects of a pilot project thought to provide support to ‘not-for-profit’ stakeholders generating or gathering data for a new therapeutic use for an authorised medicine.","PeriodicalId":374936,"journal":{"name":"The EMA’s and National Competent Authorities' perspective","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The EMA’s and National Competent Authorities' perspective","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14293/s2199-rexpo22010.v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The perspective for repurposing is quite different when one considers finding a new use for i) an active substance that has never been authorized, ii) a medicine that is still within intellectual property or regulatory data protection or iii) a well-known medicine that is out of any protection period. While pharmaceutical companies may find a commercial interest in pursuing a non-clinical and clinical development in the first two cases, they are less likely to carry out such development for out-of-protection medicines. In the third case, the current environment (regulatory and market access) does not encourage pharmaceutical companies to further explore existing opportunities in repurposing. Other parties, including academic institutions and learned societies, are more willing in general to explore repurposing options when medicines are out of these protection periods. However, this academic research rarely has an impact in terms of regulatory recognition of a new use and indication. Academic sponsors usually do not intend to become marketing authorisation holders, and may have a vague notion about regulatory requirements. In support, the EU Commission has initiated a regulatory science curriculum project called STARS. In addition, the current regulatory pathways do not foresee submission of data by parties that are not intending to be a marketing authorisation holder. This can mean that medicines are used outside their authorised uses (off-label) and official clinical guidelines might recommend their use based on available evidence, despite not being formally authorized. Under the umbrella of the Pharmaceutical Committee and as a result of the discussions at the European Commission Expert Group on Safe and Timely Access to Medicines for Patients (STAMP) a virtual Repurposing Observatory Group (RepOG) was set up in 2019 to define and test the practical aspects of a pilot project thought to provide support to ‘not-for-profit’ stakeholders generating or gathering data for a new therapeutic use for an authorised medicine.
EMA和国家主管部门的观点
当考虑寻找以下新用途时,重新利用的角度是完全不同的:1)从未获得批准的活性物质,2)仍在知识产权或监管数据保护范围内的药物,或3)已超出任何保护期的知名药物。虽然制药公司可能会发现在前两种情况下进行非临床和临床开发具有商业利益,但它们不太可能对失去保护的药物进行这种开发。在第三种情况下,目前的环境(监管和市场准入)不鼓励制药公司进一步探索再利用的现有机会。其他各方,包括学术机构和学会,一般更愿意在药物超过这些保护期时探索重新利用的选择。然而,这种学术研究很少对新用途和适应症的监管认可产生影响。学术赞助商通常不打算成为上市许可持有人,并且可能对监管要求有模糊的概念。为了提供支持,欧盟委员会启动了一个名为STARS的监管科学课程项目。此外,目前的监管途径并没有预见到不打算成为上市许可持有人的各方提交的数据。这可能意味着药物在其授权用途之外使用(标签外),官方临床指南可能会根据现有证据推荐使用这些药物,尽管没有得到正式授权。在药品委员会的保护下,作为欧盟委员会安全及时获得患者药物专家组(STAMP)讨论的结果,于2019年成立了一个虚拟的重新利用观察组(RepOG),以定义和测试一个试点项目的实际方面,该项目旨在为“非营利”利益相关者提供支持,为授权药物的新治疗用途生成或收集数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信