The Revolution That Stopped Too Soon

Jay Bergman
{"title":"The Revolution That Stopped Too Soon","authors":"Jay Bergman","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198842705.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neither Marx nor Lenin wrote much about the Revolution of 1830. This was largely because the revolution stopped too soon, thereby merely ratifying changes within the bourgeoisie instead of replacing the capitalist system (that existed to benefit the bourgeoisie) with a proletarian one. In the way the Bolsheviks explained it, the bourgeoisie split in the 1820s into more prosperous elements favouring the continuation of the Bourbon Restoration and less affluent ones that in 1830 were able to install the so-called Orléanists in power. This split, which continued, ensured the latter’s quick demise. But the proletariat was still too small and too weak and insufficiently radical politically to succeed it. However, despite its limited consequences, the Revolution of 1830 served the enormously important purpose of showing that the French Revolution, while sui generis in many ways, was also the first in a series of revolutions in the history of France that together constituted a genuine tradition of revolution.","PeriodicalId":412145,"journal":{"name":"The French Revolutionary Tradition in Russian and Soviet Politics, Political Thought, and Culture","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The French Revolutionary Tradition in Russian and Soviet Politics, Political Thought, and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198842705.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neither Marx nor Lenin wrote much about the Revolution of 1830. This was largely because the revolution stopped too soon, thereby merely ratifying changes within the bourgeoisie instead of replacing the capitalist system (that existed to benefit the bourgeoisie) with a proletarian one. In the way the Bolsheviks explained it, the bourgeoisie split in the 1820s into more prosperous elements favouring the continuation of the Bourbon Restoration and less affluent ones that in 1830 were able to install the so-called Orléanists in power. This split, which continued, ensured the latter’s quick demise. But the proletariat was still too small and too weak and insufficiently radical politically to succeed it. However, despite its limited consequences, the Revolution of 1830 served the enormously important purpose of showing that the French Revolution, while sui generis in many ways, was also the first in a series of revolutions in the history of France that together constituted a genuine tradition of revolution.
停止得太快的革命
马克思和列宁都没有写太多关于1830年革命的文章。这在很大程度上是因为革命停止得太快,因此只是批准了资产阶级内部的变化,而不是用无产阶级制度取代资本主义制度(它的存在是为了使资产阶级受益)。按照布尔什维克的解释,资产阶级在19世纪20年代分裂为支持波旁王朝复辟的较为富裕的一派,以及在1830年能够将所谓的奥尔尔萨姆主义者推上政权的较不富裕的一派。这种持续的分裂确保了后者的迅速灭亡。但是无产阶级仍然太小,太弱,在政治上不够激进,无法继承它。然而,尽管它的后果有限,1830年的革命起到了极其重要的作用,它表明,法国大革命虽然在许多方面是自成一体的,但也是法国历史上一系列革命中的第一次,这些革命共同构成了真正的革命传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信