Rethinking the Political Economy of Conservative Transition: The Case of Vietnam

A. Fforde
{"title":"Rethinking the Political Economy of Conservative Transition: The Case of Vietnam","authors":"A. Fforde","doi":"10.1080/13523270903511855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transition ‘from plan to market’ under a politically conservative regime in Vietnam, where the communist party remains in power, can be seen as an example of a process in which evolving endogenous forces drove and resourced institutional change. Two sets of phenomena are analytically important. The first may be understood as the creation and seeking out of economic rents in the ‘neo-classical’ sense of resources available ‘below economic costs’; the second, more ‘classical’, concentrates upon the central importance of ‘appropriable resources’. These two are both important because, in trying to understand emergent capitalism after transition, they push to the fore the historical emergence of factor markets (land, labour and capital). Social networks created during transition for ‘rent-switching’ later support advantageous access to resources created for plan implementation and may then, as a form of capitalism emerges, be used to access resources in forms appropriate to market-oriented activity. It becomes clear that ‘rent-switching’ may have effects upon static economic efficiency that are positive during transition but negative afterwards, so that the significance of ‘rents’ depends upon context.","PeriodicalId":206400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13523270903511855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The transition ‘from plan to market’ under a politically conservative regime in Vietnam, where the communist party remains in power, can be seen as an example of a process in which evolving endogenous forces drove and resourced institutional change. Two sets of phenomena are analytically important. The first may be understood as the creation and seeking out of economic rents in the ‘neo-classical’ sense of resources available ‘below economic costs’; the second, more ‘classical’, concentrates upon the central importance of ‘appropriable resources’. These two are both important because, in trying to understand emergent capitalism after transition, they push to the fore the historical emergence of factor markets (land, labour and capital). Social networks created during transition for ‘rent-switching’ later support advantageous access to resources created for plan implementation and may then, as a form of capitalism emerges, be used to access resources in forms appropriate to market-oriented activity. It becomes clear that ‘rent-switching’ may have effects upon static economic efficiency that are positive during transition but negative afterwards, so that the significance of ‘rents’ depends upon context.
对保守转型政治经济学的再思考:以越南为例
在政治上保守的越南政权下,“从计划到市场”的转变(共产党仍然掌权)可以被视为一个不断演变的内生力量推动和支持制度变革的过程的例子。有两组现象在分析上是重要的。第一个可以理解为“新古典主义”意义上的“低于经济成本”的资源的创造和寻求经济租金;第二种观点更为“经典”,强调“可占用资源”的核心重要性。这两者都很重要,因为在试图理解转型后的新兴资本主义时,它们把要素市场(土地、劳动力和资本)的历史出现推到了前面。在转型期间为“租金转换”而创建的社会网络,后来支持对为计划实施而创建的资源的有利获取,然后,作为一种资本主义形式的出现,可能被用来以适合市场导向活动的形式获取资源。很明显,“租金转换”可能对静态经济效率产生影响,这种影响在过渡期间是积极的,但在过渡之后是消极的,因此“租金”的重要性取决于背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信