Adiabatic Analysis of Rotary Displacer Stirling Engine

A. Bagheri, William C. Mullins, Phillip R. Foster, H. Bostanci
{"title":"Adiabatic Analysis of Rotary Displacer Stirling Engine","authors":"A. Bagheri, William C. Mullins, Phillip R. Foster, H. Bostanci","doi":"10.1115/IMECE2018-87758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Utilizing analytical models at the initial stages of Stirling engine (SE) development is a common approach since the cost could be excessive when experimental (i.e., building prototypes) or even numerical (i.e., using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)) approaches are taken first. One of the well-known analyses in this area is the adiabatic analysis that assumes working fluid to be an ideal gas, and adiabatic expansion and compression processes in the power cylinder. Although adiabatic analysis neglects pressure loss in the cycle, it still predicts operating envelope and performance with a better accuracy compared to isothermal (Schmidt) analysis. This study considers the adiabatic analysis that was originally developed for conventional, reciprocating displacer SE configuration, and aims to adapt it for an innovative, rotary displacer SE configuration. The analysis enables to present pressure-volume diagrams, and estimates the amount of generated work and the efficiency. The results, when compared to that of the ideal Schmidt analysis, indicate up to 4.6% lower values of the generated work, suggesting a significant difference between the two ideal assumptions.","PeriodicalId":307820,"journal":{"name":"Volume 8B: Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 8B: Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018-87758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Utilizing analytical models at the initial stages of Stirling engine (SE) development is a common approach since the cost could be excessive when experimental (i.e., building prototypes) or even numerical (i.e., using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)) approaches are taken first. One of the well-known analyses in this area is the adiabatic analysis that assumes working fluid to be an ideal gas, and adiabatic expansion and compression processes in the power cylinder. Although adiabatic analysis neglects pressure loss in the cycle, it still predicts operating envelope and performance with a better accuracy compared to isothermal (Schmidt) analysis. This study considers the adiabatic analysis that was originally developed for conventional, reciprocating displacer SE configuration, and aims to adapt it for an innovative, rotary displacer SE configuration. The analysis enables to present pressure-volume diagrams, and estimates the amount of generated work and the efficiency. The results, when compared to that of the ideal Schmidt analysis, indicate up to 4.6% lower values of the generated work, suggesting a significant difference between the two ideal assumptions.
旋转置换斯特林发动机的绝热分析
在斯特林发动机(SE)开发的初始阶段利用分析模型是一种常见的方法,因为首先采用实验(即构建原型)甚至数值(即使用计算流体动力学(CFD))方法时,成本可能过高。在这一领域中,一个著名的分析是绝热分析,它假设工作流体是理想气体,并在动力缸中进行绝热膨胀和压缩过程。尽管绝热分析忽略了循环中的压力损失,但与等温(施密特)分析相比,它仍然可以更好地预测工作包线和性能。本研究考虑了绝热分析,该分析最初是为传统的往复式驱油器SE配置开发的,旨在将其应用于创新的旋转驱油器SE配置。通过分析,可以显示压力-体积图,并估计产生的功和效率。与理想的施密特分析相比,结果表明,产生的工作值降低了4.6%,这表明两种理想假设之间存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信