MIA: Multi-cohort Integrated Analysis for Biomarker Identification

Brian Marks, Nina Hees, Hung Nguyen, Tin Nguyen
{"title":"MIA: Multi-cohort Integrated Analysis for Biomarker Identification","authors":"Brian Marks, Nina Hees, Hung Nguyen, Tin Nguyen","doi":"10.1145/3233547.3233605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advanced high-throughput technologies have produced vast amounts of biological data. Data integration is the key to obtain the power needed to pinpoint the biological mechanisms and biomarkers of the underlying disease. Two critical drawbacks of computational approaches for data integration is that they do not account for study bias, as well as the noisy nature of molecular data. This leads to unreliable and inconsistent results, i.e., the results change drastically when the input is slightly perturbed or when additional datasets are added to the analysis. Here we propose a multi-cohort integrated approach, named MIA, for biomarker identification that is robust to noise and study bias. We deploy a leave-one-out strategy to avoid the disproportionate influence of a single cohort. We also utilize techniques from both p-value-based and effect-size-based meta-analyses to ensure that the identified genes are significantly impacted. We compare MIA versus classical approaches (Fisher's, Stouffer's, maxP, minP, and the additive method) using 7 microarray and 4 RNASeq datasets. For each approach, we construct a disease signature using 3 datasets and then classify patients from 8 remaining datasets. MIA outperforms all existing approaches in terms of both the highest sensitivity and specificity by accurately distinguishing symptomatic patients from healthy controls.","PeriodicalId":131906,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3233547.3233605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advanced high-throughput technologies have produced vast amounts of biological data. Data integration is the key to obtain the power needed to pinpoint the biological mechanisms and biomarkers of the underlying disease. Two critical drawbacks of computational approaches for data integration is that they do not account for study bias, as well as the noisy nature of molecular data. This leads to unreliable and inconsistent results, i.e., the results change drastically when the input is slightly perturbed or when additional datasets are added to the analysis. Here we propose a multi-cohort integrated approach, named MIA, for biomarker identification that is robust to noise and study bias. We deploy a leave-one-out strategy to avoid the disproportionate influence of a single cohort. We also utilize techniques from both p-value-based and effect-size-based meta-analyses to ensure that the identified genes are significantly impacted. We compare MIA versus classical approaches (Fisher's, Stouffer's, maxP, minP, and the additive method) using 7 microarray and 4 RNASeq datasets. For each approach, we construct a disease signature using 3 datasets and then classify patients from 8 remaining datasets. MIA outperforms all existing approaches in terms of both the highest sensitivity and specificity by accurately distinguishing symptomatic patients from healthy controls.
MIA:生物标志物鉴定的多队列综合分析
先进的高通量技术产生了大量的生物数据。数据整合是获得查明潜在疾病的生物学机制和生物标志物所需的能力的关键。数据集成计算方法的两个关键缺点是它们没有考虑到研究偏差,以及分子数据的嘈杂性质。这会导致不可靠和不一致的结果,即,当输入稍微受到干扰或在分析中添加额外的数据集时,结果会发生剧烈变化。在这里,我们提出了一种多队列综合方法,称为MIA,用于生物标志物鉴定,对噪声和研究偏差具有鲁棒性。我们采用了“留一个”策略,以避免单个队列的不成比例的影响。我们还利用基于p值和基于效应大小的荟萃分析技术来确保已识别的基因受到显著影响。我们使用7个微阵列和4个RNASeq数据集比较MIA与经典方法(Fisher’s, Stouffer’s, maxP, minP和additive method)。对于每种方法,我们使用3个数据集构建疾病签名,然后从剩下的8个数据集中对患者进行分类。MIA通过准确地将有症状的患者与健康对照者区分开来,在灵敏度和特异性方面优于所有现有的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信