Periodic Blade Loads on Propellers in Tangential and Longitudinal Wakes

R. Boswell, S. Jessup, Kidong Kim
{"title":"Periodic Blade Loads on Propellers in Tangential and Longitudinal Wakes","authors":"R. Boswell, S. Jessup, Kidong Kim","doi":"10.5957/pss-1981-011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Periodic single-blade loads were measured on model propellers in inclined flow and in a single-cycle circumferentially non-uniform longitudinal velocity field. The experimental results were correlated with predictions by the following methods:\n 1. A quasi-steady procedure developed by McCarthy at David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and' Development Center (DTNSRDC)\n 2. An unsteady lifting surface theory developed by Tsakonas and his colleagues at Davidson Laboratory,\n 3 An unsteady lifting Surface theory developed by Kerwin and Lee. at MIT,\n 4. A refinement by Kerwin to the method of Kerwin and Lee to consider the inclination of the propeller slipstream.\n In inclined flow, all four of the calculation methods evaluated consistently underprediCted1 the experimental values of the periodic single-blade loads. The method of Kerwin, which considers the inclination of the slipstream relative to the propeller axis, produced the best correlation· with experimental values. These correlations show that the inclination of the propeller slipstream relative to the propeller axis significantly influence the periodic single-blade loads. The importance of this inclination· increases with increasing ,time-average loading.","PeriodicalId":121399,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, May 26, 1981","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, May 26, 1981","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5957/pss-1981-011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Periodic single-blade loads were measured on model propellers in inclined flow and in a single-cycle circumferentially non-uniform longitudinal velocity field. The experimental results were correlated with predictions by the following methods: 1. A quasi-steady procedure developed by McCarthy at David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and' Development Center (DTNSRDC) 2. An unsteady lifting surface theory developed by Tsakonas and his colleagues at Davidson Laboratory, 3 An unsteady lifting Surface theory developed by Kerwin and Lee. at MIT, 4. A refinement by Kerwin to the method of Kerwin and Lee to consider the inclination of the propeller slipstream. In inclined flow, all four of the calculation methods evaluated consistently underprediCted1 the experimental values of the periodic single-blade loads. The method of Kerwin, which considers the inclination of the slipstream relative to the propeller axis, produced the best correlation· with experimental values. These correlations show that the inclination of the propeller slipstream relative to the propeller axis significantly influence the periodic single-blade loads. The importance of this inclination· increases with increasing ,time-average loading.
桨叶在切向和纵向尾迹中的周期性载荷
对模型螺旋桨在倾斜流和单周非均匀纵向速度场下的周期性单叶载荷进行了测量。通过以下方法将实验结果与预测结果进行关联:由David W. Taylor海军舰艇研究与发展中心(DTNSRDC)的McCarthy开发的准稳定程序2。由Tsakonas和他的同事在Davidson实验室提出的非定常升力面理论,3由Kerwin和Lee提出的非定常升力面理论。在麻省理工学院,排名第四。克尔文对考虑螺旋桨滑流倾斜的克尔文和李方法的改进。在斜流条件下,四种计算方法的计算结果均低于单叶片周期性载荷的实验值。考虑滑流相对于螺旋桨轴的倾角的Kerwin方法与实验值的相关性最好。这些相关性表明,螺旋桨滑流相对于螺旋桨轴的倾角对周期性单叶载荷有显著影响。这种倾斜度的重要性随着时间平均荷载的增加而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信