{"title":"ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRACY AND SOCIETY MODEL IN THE PROCESS OF SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CHANGE IN WAJO","authors":"Indar Arifin","doi":"10.32528/pi.v0i0.2546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aims of the study are to explain, to analyze, and to find a relationship model between government bureaucracy and society in the process of social and political change in Wajo regency. Data collection methods used in this study were Focus Group Discussion (FGD), documentation, intensive interaction, in depth interview and other instruments. Samples were selected by purposive and snowball methods. Informants in this study are both from internal and external bureaucracy. Internal bureaucracy informants consisted of; (1) strategic apex (top-level management), (2) middle line (chief executive), (3) operating core (executant), while the external bureaucracy informants can be classified into four groups; (1) local elite which consist of local figures and its stakeholders within the area, (2) modern elite, consists of scholars, teachers, headmasters and retired government official, (3) religion elite, consists of head of Islamic-boarding-school and ustadz , (4) community elite consists of non-governmental organization, youth leaders, women and even fisherman leaders. The results of the study provide an explanation of the relationship between the local bureaucracy with the local community, which was forming 4 (four) relationship models namely (1) Adaptive Model, (2) Accommodative Model, (3) Humanist Model, and (4) Tiered Elite Model. The most popular model of society is the Humanist model. Tiered Elite Model, on the other hand, creates pseudo harmony and put bureaucracy under the pressure of the hidden hand . There are three basic models and AAH model which consists of adaptive, accommodative and humanist is the preferred one. These four models can become theories in the context of a harmonious relationship between the government bureaucracy and society in the process of social and political change. These theories can be a source of inspiration in any social relationship that supports every harmonious social relationship.","PeriodicalId":418015,"journal":{"name":"Prosiding ICOGISS 2019: International Confrence On Governance Innovation And Social Sciences","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosiding ICOGISS 2019: International Confrence On Governance Innovation And Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32528/pi.v0i0.2546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aims of the study are to explain, to analyze, and to find a relationship model between government bureaucracy and society in the process of social and political change in Wajo regency. Data collection methods used in this study were Focus Group Discussion (FGD), documentation, intensive interaction, in depth interview and other instruments. Samples were selected by purposive and snowball methods. Informants in this study are both from internal and external bureaucracy. Internal bureaucracy informants consisted of; (1) strategic apex (top-level management), (2) middle line (chief executive), (3) operating core (executant), while the external bureaucracy informants can be classified into four groups; (1) local elite which consist of local figures and its stakeholders within the area, (2) modern elite, consists of scholars, teachers, headmasters and retired government official, (3) religion elite, consists of head of Islamic-boarding-school and ustadz , (4) community elite consists of non-governmental organization, youth leaders, women and even fisherman leaders. The results of the study provide an explanation of the relationship between the local bureaucracy with the local community, which was forming 4 (four) relationship models namely (1) Adaptive Model, (2) Accommodative Model, (3) Humanist Model, and (4) Tiered Elite Model. The most popular model of society is the Humanist model. Tiered Elite Model, on the other hand, creates pseudo harmony and put bureaucracy under the pressure of the hidden hand . There are three basic models and AAH model which consists of adaptive, accommodative and humanist is the preferred one. These four models can become theories in the context of a harmonious relationship between the government bureaucracy and society in the process of social and political change. These theories can be a source of inspiration in any social relationship that supports every harmonious social relationship.
本研究的目的是解释、分析和寻找瓦霍摄政时期社会政治变革过程中政府官僚主义与社会的关系模型。本研究采用焦点小组讨论(Focus Group Discussion, FGD)、文献记录、密集互动、深度访谈等方法收集数据。采用目的法和滚雪球法选取样本。本研究中的线人来自内部和外部官僚机构。内部官僚机构的线人包括;(1)战略顶点(高层管理者)、(2)中线(首席执行官)、(3)经营核心(执行者),而外部科层制举报人可分为四类;(1)当地精英,由当地人物及其利益相关者组成;(2)现代精英,由学者、教师、校长和退休政府官员组成;(3)宗教精英,由伊斯兰寄宿学校和ustadz的负责人组成;(4)社区精英,由非政府组织、青年领袖、妇女甚至渔民领袖组成。研究结果解释了地方官僚与地方社区之间的关系,并形成了4种关系模型,即(1)适应性模型、(2)适应性模型、(3)人文主义模型和(4)分层精英模型。最流行的社会模式是人文主义模式。另一方面,分层精英模式创造了伪和谐,并将官僚主义置于隐藏之手的压力之下。有三种基本模式,其中适应性模式、适应性模式和人性化模式是首选模式。在社会政治变革过程中,政府官僚与社会和谐相处的背景下,这四种模式都可以成为理论。这些理论可以成为任何社会关系的灵感来源,支持每一个和谐的社会关系。