Penyimpangan Prinsip Kerja Sama dalam Naskah Drama Bunga Rumah Makan Karya Utuy Tatang Sontani

Fitria Rahmawati Zain
{"title":"Penyimpangan Prinsip Kerja Sama dalam Naskah Drama Bunga Rumah Makan Karya Utuy Tatang Sontani","authors":"Fitria Rahmawati Zain","doi":"10.22515/academica.v2i1.2238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn drama scripts, of course there are dialog interactions, these dialogues often bring up various interpretations. In this study, the author will discuss violations and the principles of cooperation contained in the drama “Bunga Rumah Makan”. Inspected with a pragmatic approach and implications for Indonesian language and literature learning materials. The purpose of writing this article is to find out and obtain a description of the implications of the discourse in the play. The type of this research is qualitative. The method used is descriptive analysis method. As a result, the drama script of “Bunga Rumah Makan” by Utuy Tatang Sontani violated the principles of cooperation, namely the quantity maxim, quality maxim, relevance maxim, and implementation maxim. Deviations found in the drama “Bunga Rumah Makan” text which arise due to violations of the principle of cooperation consist of different kinds of implicature. The implicature is an implicature that is clear, hateful, seductive, and refusing. This proves that conversations that do not carry out the principle of cooperation will produce implicature in a conversation.Keywords: Drama, the principle of cooperation, maxim","PeriodicalId":184053,"journal":{"name":"Academica : Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academica : Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22515/academica.v2i1.2238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractIn drama scripts, of course there are dialog interactions, these dialogues often bring up various interpretations. In this study, the author will discuss violations and the principles of cooperation contained in the drama “Bunga Rumah Makan”. Inspected with a pragmatic approach and implications for Indonesian language and literature learning materials. The purpose of writing this article is to find out and obtain a description of the implications of the discourse in the play. The type of this research is qualitative. The method used is descriptive analysis method. As a result, the drama script of “Bunga Rumah Makan” by Utuy Tatang Sontani violated the principles of cooperation, namely the quantity maxim, quality maxim, relevance maxim, and implementation maxim. Deviations found in the drama “Bunga Rumah Makan” text which arise due to violations of the principle of cooperation consist of different kinds of implicature. The implicature is an implicature that is clear, hateful, seductive, and refusing. This proves that conversations that do not carry out the principle of cooperation will produce implicature in a conversation.Keywords: Drama, the principle of cooperation, maxim
信使·塔唐·桑塔尼在温室戏剧中的合作原理歪曲
在戏剧剧本中,当然有对话互动,这些对话往往会带来各种各样的解释。在本研究中,作者将讨论违规行为和合作原则包含在戏剧 - œBunga Rumah makan -”。考察了实用主义的方法和对印度尼西亚语言和文学学习材料的影响。写这篇文章的目的是找出并获得对剧中话语含义的描述。这项研究的类型是定性的。采用的方法是描述性分析法。因此,Utuy Tatang Sontani的话剧剧本《€œBunga Rumah makan€》违背了合作原则,即数量准则、质量准则、关联准则和执行准则。在戏剧作品 - œBunga Rumah makan -文本中,由于违背合作原则而产生的偏差包含了不同的含义。含意是一种清晰的、可恨的、诱人的、拒绝的含意。这证明,不执行合作原则的对话将在对话中产生含意。关键词:戏剧,合作原则,格言
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信