Female Participation in Parliamentary Elections and their Perceptions of Political Efficacy in Angola

Beatriz Bernardo, Nelson De Almeida
{"title":"Female Participation in Parliamentary Elections and their Perceptions of Political Efficacy in Angola","authors":"Beatriz Bernardo, Nelson De Almeida","doi":"10.58425/ajlps.v1i1.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of personality traits and political efficacy on electoral outcomes among selected female parliamentary contestants during general elections in Angola. \nMethodology: It used purposive and snowball sampling methods. Data was collected using the BFI and PES Scales. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze participant’s demographic information. A One-way ANOVA was used to examine differences while a Chi-Square was used to examine associations between successful and non-successful contestants. \nFindings: The study found a positive association between external efficacy and electoral outcome χ2 (2, n=42) = 8.04, p = .005. An ANOVA yielded no significant difference in extraversion between successful (M = 4.18, SD = 1.00) and non-successful (M = 0.519, SD = .519) participants (F (1, 40) =.984, p = .327); no significant differences in neuroticism between successful (M = 2.00, SD =.54) and non-successful (M = 1.99, SD =.533) participants (F (1, 40), .005, p = .946); no significant difference in openness between successful (M = 3.89, SD =.563) and non-successful (M = 3.72, SD =.734) participants (F (1, 40), .717, p = 402). \nConclusion: In conclusion, the study found personality traits and political efficacy judgments as able to determine electoral outcomes. It was evident that external and internal political efficacy associated with electoral success and moderate the effect of personality traits. \nRecommendation: The study proposed that female political aspirants should seek personality assessment and counselling to enhance self-understanding, harness the strengths of their personality trait and manage its weaknesses and they should nurture personality traits and political efficacy judgements that enhance their connection and favor with the electorate.   ","PeriodicalId":302325,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Law and Political Science","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Law and Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58425/ajlps.v1i1.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of personality traits and political efficacy on electoral outcomes among selected female parliamentary contestants during general elections in Angola. Methodology: It used purposive and snowball sampling methods. Data was collected using the BFI and PES Scales. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze participant’s demographic information. A One-way ANOVA was used to examine differences while a Chi-Square was used to examine associations between successful and non-successful contestants. Findings: The study found a positive association between external efficacy and electoral outcome χ2 (2, n=42) = 8.04, p = .005. An ANOVA yielded no significant difference in extraversion between successful (M = 4.18, SD = 1.00) and non-successful (M = 0.519, SD = .519) participants (F (1, 40) =.984, p = .327); no significant differences in neuroticism between successful (M = 2.00, SD =.54) and non-successful (M = 1.99, SD =.533) participants (F (1, 40), .005, p = .946); no significant difference in openness between successful (M = 3.89, SD =.563) and non-successful (M = 3.72, SD =.734) participants (F (1, 40), .717, p = 402). Conclusion: In conclusion, the study found personality traits and political efficacy judgments as able to determine electoral outcomes. It was evident that external and internal political efficacy associated with electoral success and moderate the effect of personality traits. Recommendation: The study proposed that female political aspirants should seek personality assessment and counselling to enhance self-understanding, harness the strengths of their personality trait and manage its weaknesses and they should nurture personality traits and political efficacy judgements that enhance their connection and favor with the electorate.   
安哥拉妇女参加议会选举及其对政治效能的看法
目的:本研究的目的是探讨人格特质和政治效能对安哥拉大选女性议会候选人选举结果的影响。方法:采用目的抽样法和滚雪球抽样法。使用BFI和PES量表收集数据。使用描述性统计分析参与者的人口统计信息。使用单因素方差分析来检查差异,而使用卡方来检查成功和不成功的参赛者之间的关联。结果:研究发现外部疗效与选举结果呈正相关χ2 (2, n=42) = 8.04, p = 0.005。方差分析显示,成功参与者(M = 4.18, SD = 1.00)和不成功参与者(M = 0.519, SD = 0.519)的外向性没有显著差异(F(1,40) =)。984, p = .327);成功参与者(M = 2.00, SD = 0.54)和不成功参与者(M = 1.99, SD = 0.533)的神经质程度无显著差异(F (1,40), 0.005, p = 0.946);成功参与者(M = 3.89, SD =.563)与不成功参与者(M = 3.72, SD =.734)的开放性无显著差异(F (1,40), 0.717, p = 402)。结论:总之,研究发现人格特质和政治效能判断能够决定选举结果。很明显,外部和内部的政治效能与选举成功有关,并缓和了人格特质的影响。建议:本研究建议女性参政人士应寻求人格评估及辅导,以增进自我了解,善用人格特质之长处,管理其短处,并培养能增进与选民联系及好感的人格特质及政治效能判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信