Analysis Of The Anytime MAPF Solvers Based On The Combination Of Conflict-Based Search (CBS) and Focal Search (FS)

Ilya Ivanashev, A. Andreychuk, K. Yakovlev
{"title":"Analysis Of The Anytime MAPF Solvers Based On The Combination Of Conflict-Based Search (CBS) and Focal Search (FS)","authors":"Ilya Ivanashev, A. Andreychuk, K. Yakovlev","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2209.09612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Conflict-Based Search (CBS) is a widely used algorithm for solving multi-agent pathfinding (MAPF) problems optimally. The core idea of CBS is to run hierarchical search, when, on the high level the tree of solutions candidates is explored, and on the low-level an individual planning for a specific agent (subject to certain constraints) is carried out. To trade-off optimality for running time different variants of bounded sub-optimal CBS were designed, which alter both high- and low-level search routines of CBS. Moreover, anytime variant of CBS does exist that applies Focal Search (FS) to the high-level of CBS – Anytime BCBS. However, no comprehensive analysis of how well this algorithm performs compared to the naive one, when we simply re-invoke CBS with the decreased sub-optimality bound, was present. This work aims at filling this gap. Moreover, we present and evaluate another anytime version of CBS that uses FS on both levels of CBS. Empirically, we show that its behavior is principally different from the one demonstrated by Anytime BCBS. Finally, we compare both algorithms head-to-head and show that using Focal Search on both levels of CBS can be beneficial in a wide range of setups.","PeriodicalId":166595,"journal":{"name":"Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.09612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. Conflict-Based Search (CBS) is a widely used algorithm for solving multi-agent pathfinding (MAPF) problems optimally. The core idea of CBS is to run hierarchical search, when, on the high level the tree of solutions candidates is explored, and on the low-level an individual planning for a specific agent (subject to certain constraints) is carried out. To trade-off optimality for running time different variants of bounded sub-optimal CBS were designed, which alter both high- and low-level search routines of CBS. Moreover, anytime variant of CBS does exist that applies Focal Search (FS) to the high-level of CBS – Anytime BCBS. However, no comprehensive analysis of how well this algorithm performs compared to the naive one, when we simply re-invoke CBS with the decreased sub-optimality bound, was present. This work aims at filling this gap. Moreover, we present and evaluate another anytime version of CBS that uses FS on both levels of CBS. Empirically, we show that its behavior is principally different from the one demonstrated by Anytime BCBS. Finally, we compare both algorithms head-to-head and show that using Focal Search on both levels of CBS can be beneficial in a wide range of setups.
基于冲突搜索(CBS)和焦点搜索(FS)相结合的任意时刻MAPF求解器分析
. 基于冲突的搜索(CBS)是一种广泛应用的多智能体寻路算法。CBS的核心思想是运行分层搜索,在高层上探索解决方案候选树,在低层为特定代理(受某些约束)执行单个计划。为了权衡运行时间的最优性,设计了不同的有界次优CBS变体,这些变体改变了CBS的高级和低级搜索例程。此外,CBS的任何时间变体确实存在,它将焦点搜索(FS)应用于CBS的高层-任何时间BCBS。但是,没有对该算法与朴素算法相比的性能进行全面的分析,当我们简单地重新调用具有降低的次最优性边界的CBS时。这项工作旨在填补这一空白。此外,我们提出并评估了CBS的另一个随时版本,该版本在CBS的两个级别上都使用FS。经验表明,它的行为与任何时间BCBS所证明的行为主要不同。最后,我们比较了这两种算法,并表明在两个CBS级别上使用焦点搜索在广泛的设置中都是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信